Literature DB >> 1444169

Method comparison--a different approach.

M A Pollock1, S G Jefferson, J W Kane, K Lomax, G MacKinnon, C B Winnard.   

Abstract

The commonly accepted method of analysing data from method comparison studies is regression analysis, a method which has limitations. This study illustrates the use of a graphical presentation of data, the difference plot, which can be used as an alternative to least squares regression analysis. The data from comparison studies performed on five methods were analysed both by Deming's regression analysis, with calculation of the correlation coefficient, and by the difference plot. The results show that in most cases much more relevant information was obtained from the difference plot.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1444169     DOI: 10.1177/000456329202900512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  24 in total

1.  Affordable CD4(+)-T-cell counting by flow cytometry: CD45 gating for volumetric analysis.

Authors:  George Janossy; Ilesh V Jani; Nicholas J Bradley; Arsene Bikoue; Tim Pitfield; Debbie K Glencross
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2002-09

2.  Agreement between the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) stereometric parameters estimated using HRT-I and HRT-II.

Authors:  Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Assessment of bias with emphasis on method comparison.

Authors:  Roger Johnson
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2008-08

Review 4.  Role of variability in explaining ethanol pharmacokinetics: research and forensic applications.

Authors:  Ake Norberg; A Wayne Jones; Robert G Hahn; Johan L Gabrielsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Scintigraphic measurement of gastric emptying and ultrasonographic assessment of antral area: relation to appetite.

Authors:  K Hveem; K L Jones; B E Chatterton; M Horowitz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Accuracy and precision of manual segmentation of the maxillary sinus in MR images-a method study.

Authors:  Tobias N Andersen; Tron A Darvann; Shumei Murakami; Per Larsen; Yurie Senda; Anders Bilde; Christian V Buchwald; Sven Kreiborg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Validation of a single-platform, volumetric, CD45-assisted PanLeucogating Auto40 flow cytometer to determine the absolute number and percentages of CD4 T cells in resource-constrained settings using Cameroonian patients' samples.

Authors:  François-Xavier Mbopi-Kéou; Stefano Mion; Bertrand Sagnia; Laurent Bélec
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-02-15

8.  An immunomagnetic single-platform image cytometer for cell enumeration based on antibody specificity.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Arjan G J Tibbe; Erik Droog; Leon W M M Terstappen; Jan Greve
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-02-07

9.  Performance of the PointCare NOW system for CD4 counting in HIV patients based on five independent evaluations.

Authors:  Michèle Bergeron; Géraldine Daneau; Tao Ding; Nadia E Sitoe; Larry E Westerman; Jocelijn Stokx; Ilesh V Jani; Lindi M Coetzee; Lesley Scott; Anja De Weggheleire; Luc Boel; Wendy S Stevens; Deborah K Glencross; Trevor F Peter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Single-platform, volumetric, CD45-assisted pan-leucogating flow cytometry for CD4 T lymphocytes monitoring of HIV infection according to the WHO recommendations for resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Donato Koyalta; Mohammad-Ali Jenabian; Ngamasra Nadjiouroum; Barou Djouater; Noël Djemadji-Oudjeil; Angélique Ndjoyi-Mbiguino; Laurent Bélec
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.