Literature DB >> 1443751

Direct effects of propofol on myocardial contractility in in situ canine hearts.

E F Ismail1, S J Kim, M R Salem, G J Crystal.   

Abstract

The pronounced decrease in arterial blood pressure evident during anesthetic induction with propofol has raised the possibility that propofol has a direct negative inotropic effect. Previous attempts to evaluate this mechanism in vivo have been inconclusive because of confounding variables associated with intravenous administration of propofol. Accordingly, in the current study, steady-state changes in myocardial contractility and related hemodynamic parameters were assessed during intracoronary infusions of propofol in seven open-chest dogs anesthetized with fentanyl and midazolam. The left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was cannulated and perfused at controlled pressure (100 mmHg) with normal arterial blood. In LAD-perfused myocardium, contractility was evaluated from measurements of percent segmental shortening (%SS) obtained with ultrasonic crystals. Coronary blood flow in LAD was measured electromagnetically and used to calculate myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2; Fick principle) and coronary propofol concentration. Propofol was infused into the LAD at 150, 300, 600, and 1,200 micrograms/min (P-150, P-300, P-600, P-1,200). These infusion rates yielded calculated blood concentrations of 7 +/- 1, 15 +/- 1, 26 +/- 2, and 50 +/- 5 micrograms.ml-1, respectively. The calculated blood concentrations at P-150 were in the clinical range, whereas those at P-300, P-600, and P-1,200 were supratherapeutic. P-150 had no effect on %SS, whereas higher infusion rates caused decreases in %SS. Changes in MVO2 by propofol generally paralleled changes in %SS. At P-150 and P-300, coronary blood flow was proportional to MVO2, whereas at P-600 and P-1,200, coronary blood flow was in excess of the prevailing MVO2, resulting in increased coronary venous oxygen tension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1443751     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199211000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

1.  The differential effect of propofol on contractility of isolated myocardial trabeculae of rat and guinea-pig.

Authors:  J van Klarenbosch; G J Stienen; W de Ruijter; G J Scheffer; J J de Lange
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Intraoperative hemodynamic management for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: two case reports.

Authors:  Seiji Watanabe; Takahiko Itou; Shinya Kaneko; Tadashi Isomura; Tatsuhiko Kano
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Propofol in patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  N R Searle; P Sahab
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Intracoronary propofol does not decrease myocardial contractile function in the dog.

Authors:  S E Belo; R Kolesar; C D Mazer
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  A Fast Parameter Identification Framework for Personalized Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Chenxi Yang; Negar Tavassolian; Wassim M Haddad; James M Bailey; Behnood Gholami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Haemodynamic changes during propofol induction in dogs: new findings and approach of monitoring.

Authors:  Andrea Cattai; Roberto Rabozzi; Heidi Ferasin; Maurizio Isola; Paolo Franci
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.741

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.