R J Biggar1, M Melbye. 1. AIDS Research, Danish Cancer Registry, Copenhagen.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Low response rates to voluntary surveys raise questions about how representative the responses are. We compared the behavior and attitudes of responders, willing and reluctant, and nonresponders to anonymous questionnaires about behaviors that might expose participants to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 1080 Danish adults 18 through 59 years including explicit questions about sexual acts and illegal drug use. Identical questionnaires were sent to 3600 other Danes, similarly chosen; packets sent to these persons included cards to be returned separately informing us that they had responded. Questionnaires were sent twice more to nonresponders, who, if they then responded, were considered reluctant responders. One hundred nonresponders were telephoned and asked why they had refused to respond. RESULTS: Enclosing return cards did not affect initial response rate, but prompting boosted replies from 52% to 73%. However, behaviors were generally similar among initial and reluctant responders. One third of nonresponders agreed to respond if we wished (total potential response: 82%). In general, the reasons for nonresponse did not suggest that the life-styles of nonresponders placed them at risk for HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: This method provides a simple, inexpensive approach to improving response rates and learning about the biases of reluctant responders and nonresponders.
OBJECTIVES: Low response rates to voluntary surveys raise questions about how representative the responses are. We compared the behavior and attitudes of responders, willing and reluctant, and nonresponders to anonymous questionnaires about behaviors that might expose participants to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 1080 Danish adults 18 through 59 years including explicit questions about sexual acts and illegal drug use. Identical questionnaires were sent to 3600 other Danes, similarly chosen; packets sent to these persons included cards to be returned separately informing us that they had responded. Questionnaires were sent twice more to nonresponders, who, if they then responded, were considered reluctant responders. One hundred nonresponders were telephoned and asked why they had refused to respond. RESULTS: Enclosing return cards did not affect initial response rate, but prompting boosted replies from 52% to 73%. However, behaviors were generally similar among initial and reluctant responders. One third of nonresponders agreed to respond if we wished (total potential response: 82%). In general, the reasons for nonresponse did not suggest that the life-styles of nonresponders placed them at risk for HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: This method provides a simple, inexpensive approach to improving response rates and learning about the biases of reluctant responders and nonresponders.
Authors: S K Kjaer; G Engholm; C Teisen; B J Haugaard; E Lynge; R B Christensen; K A Møller; H Jensen; P Poll; B F Vestergaard Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: S Z Wiktor; R J Biggar; M Melbye; P Ebbesen; G Colclough; R DiGioia; W C Sanchez; R J Grossman; J J Goedert Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988) Date: 1990
Authors: R A Coates; L M Calzavara; C L Soskolne; S E Read; M M Fanning; F A Shepherd; M H Klein; J K Johnson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1988-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: A M Johnson; J Wadsworth; P Elliott; L Prior; P Wallace; S Blower; N L Webb; G I Heald; D L Miller; M W Adler Journal: AIDS Date: 1989-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Françoise Dubois-Arber; Giovanna Meystre-Agustoni; Jeannin André; Kim De Heller; Pécoud Alain; Patrick Bodenmann Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Maureen Murdoch; Alisha Baines Simon; Melissa Anderson Polusny; Ann Kay Bangerter; Joseph Patrick Grill; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Melissa Ruth Partin Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08