| Literature DB >> 1439317 |
Abstract
A new phase in the development of an instrument designed for the measurement of clinical competence is presented. The instrument (exam type) was previously validated; we report its use in three generations of students of a specialization course in internal medicine: those recently admitted to the course (group I); those finishing their first training year (group II) and those finishing the second year (group III). In the exam 304 out of the 600 questions included were classified as "experimental" (dealing with knowledge in internal medicine) and the remaining 296 questions corresponded to "control" questions (dealing with knowledge in other specialties). The variables considered in the exam were: 1) global result; 2) usage of diagnostic indicators; 3) omission of necessary procedures without a iatrogenic effect; 4) commission of unnecessary procedures without a iatrogenic effect; 5) omission of necessary procedures with resulting iatrogenic consequences; 6) commission of unnecessary procedures with resulting iatrogenic consequences; 7) global omission (variables 3 and 5); 8) global commission (variables 4 and 6); 9) global iatrogenesis (variables 5 and 6); 10) knowledge in nosology. Scores obtained by the three groups on the experimental questions differed in accordance with the respective time of clinical experience (group I obtained the lowest scores, group II showed intermediate scores, and group III showed the highest scores). Analysis of variance was significant (p less than 0.05) in variables 1, 2, 6, 8 and 9. The scores obtained by the three groups on the control questions were similar. In conclusion, we believe that this instrument is capable of detecting learning dependent on the time of clinical experience.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 1439317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Invest Clin ISSN: 0034-8376 Impact factor: 1.451