Literature DB >> 1438639

Depressed mothers as informants about their children: a critical review of the evidence for distortion.

J E Richters1.   

Abstract

The claim that depressed mothers have distorted, inflated, perceptions of their children's problems has been made with increasing frequency in recent years. This review explicates the significance of the depression-->distortion controversy, introduces a set of standards for evaluating distortion claims, and uses these standards to evaluate the key characteristics of 22 studies that have published data directly relevant to the distortion question. None of the studies that claimed evidence for a depression-->distortion influence on mothers' ratings of their children met the necessary and sufficient criteria for establishing distortion. This review challenges the empirical foundation for the widely held assumption that depressed mothers have distorted perceptions of their children's problems. Issues that will require reckoning in future efforts to explore the depression-->distortion question are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1438639     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  177 in total

1.  Maternal depressive symptoms and child behavior problems in a nationally representative normal birthweight sample.

Authors:  D Civic; V L Holt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

2.  Through a mother's eyes: Sources of bias when mothers with co-occurring disorders assess their children.

Authors:  Karen M Hennigan; Maura O'Keefe; Chanson D Noether; Deborah J Rinehart; Lisa A Russell
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 3.  Comorbidity and child psychopathology: recommendations for the next decade.

Authors:  Peter S Jensen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2003-06

4.  Temporal relations in daily-reported maternal mood and disruptive child behavior.

Authors:  Frank J Elgar; Daniel A Waschbusch; Patrick J McGrath; Sherry H Stewart; Lori J Curtis
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2004-06

5.  Informants are not all equal: predictors and correlates of clinician judgments about caregiver and youth credibility.

Authors:  Eric A Youngstrom; Jennifer Kogos Youngstrom; Andrew J Freeman; Andres De Los Reyes; Norah C Feeny; Robert L Findling
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.576

6.  Informant discrepancies in clinical reports of youths and interviewers' impressions of the reliability of informants.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes; Eric A Youngstrom; Anna J Swan; Jennifer K Youngstrom; Norah C Feeny; Robert L Findling
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 7.  Depressed mothers as informants on child behavior: methodological issues.

Authors:  Monica Roosa Ordway
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Testing informant discrepancies as predictors of early adolescent psychopathology: why difference scores cannot tell you what you want to know and how polynomial regression may.

Authors:  Robert D Laird; Andres De Los Reyes
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-01

Review 9.  Understanding and using informants' reporting discrepancies of youth victimization: a conceptual model and recommendations for research.

Authors:  Kimberly L Goodman; Andres De Los Reyes; Catherine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-12

10.  Correlates of expressed emotion in mothers of clinically-referred youth: an examination of the five-minute speech sample.

Authors:  Carolyn A McCarty; John R Weisz
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.