Literature DB >> 1438221

Adaptive cellular interactions in the immune system: the tunable activation threshold and the significance of subthreshold responses.

Z Grossman1, W E Paul.   

Abstract

A major challenge for immunologists is to explain how the immune system adjusts its responses to the microenvironmental context in which antigens are recognized. We propose that lymphocytes achieve this by tuning and updating their responsiveness to recurrent signals. In particular, cellular anergy in vivo is a dynamic state in which the threshold for a stereotypic mode of activation has been elevated. Anergy is associated with other forms of cellular activity, not paralysis. Cells engaged in such subthreshold interactions mediate functions such as maintenance of immunological memory and control of infections. In such interactions, patterns of signals are recognized and classified and evoke selective responses. The robust mechanism proposed for segregation of suprathreshold and subthreshold immune responses allows lymphocytes to use recognition of self-antigens in executing physiological functions. Autoreactivity is allowed where it is dissociated from uncontrolled aggression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1438221      PMCID: PMC50339          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  T cell reactivity to MHC molecules: immunity versus tolerance.

Authors:  J Sprent; E K Gao; S R Webb
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Proliferative T cell anergy to MIs-1a does not correlate with in vivo tolerance.

Authors:  A Bandeira; J Mengel; O Burlen-Defranoux; A Coutinho
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.823

3.  Self-nonself discrimination by T cells.

Authors:  H von Boehmer; P Kisielow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The role of the T cell receptor in positive and negative selection of developing T cells.

Authors:  M Blackman; J Kappler; P Marrack
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  The costimulatory function of antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  C T Weaver; E R Unanue
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1990-02

Review 6.  Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis.

Authors:  M Kirschner; T Mitchison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-05-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Function and specificity of T cell subsets in the mouse.

Authors:  J Sprent; S R Webb
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.543

8.  Tolerance in transgenic mice expressing major histocompatibility molecules extrathymically on pancreatic cells.

Authors:  L C Burkly; D Lo; R A Flavell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Defining protective responses to pathogens: cytokine profiles in leprosy lesions.

Authors:  M Yamamura; K Uyemura; R J Deans; K Weinberg; T H Rea; B R Bloom; R L Modlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Generation and analysis of interleukin-4 deficient mice.

Authors:  R Kühn; K Rajewsky; W Müller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  67 in total

Review 1.  Conceptual shifts in immunology: comments on the "two-way paradigm".

Authors:  A I Tauber
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-09

2.  Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors.

Authors:  C Chan; A J George; J Stark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Crossreactive recognition of viral, self, and bacterial peptide ligands by human class I-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte clonotypes: implications for molecular mimicry in autoimmune disease.

Authors:  I S Misko; S M Cross; R Khanna; S L Elliott; C Schmidt; S J Pye; S L Silins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effects of thymic selection on the range of T cell cross-reactivity.

Authors:  Dennis L Chao; Miles P Davenport; Stephanie Forrest; Alan S Perelson
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  T-cell avidity and tuning: the flexible connection between tolerance and autoimmunity.

Authors:  Jasper G van den Boorn; I Caroline Le Poole; Rosalie M Luiten
Journal:  Int Rev Immunol       Date:  2006 May-Aug       Impact factor: 5.311

6.  MHC class II deprivation impairs CD4 T cell motility and responsiveness to antigen-bearing dendritic cells in vivo.

Authors:  Ursula B Fischer; Erica L Jacovetty; Ricardo B Medeiros; Brian D Goudy; Traci Zell; Jeannie-Beth Swanson; Elizabeth Lorenz; Yoji Shimizu; Mark J Miller; Alexander Khoruts; Elizabeth Ingulli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Quantitative challenges in understanding ligand discrimination by alphabeta T cells.

Authors:  Ofer Feinerman; Ronald N Germain; Grégoire Altan-Bonnet
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 4.407

8.  Maximal frustration as an immunological principle.

Authors:  F Vistulo de Abreu; P Mostardinha
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Alloreactive CD8 T cell tolerance requires recipient B cells, dendritic cells, and MHC class II.

Authors:  Thomas Fehr; Fabienne Haspot; Joshua Mollov; Meredith Chittenden; Timothy Hogan; Megan Sykes
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 10.  Self-reactivity as the necessary cost of maintaining a diverse memory T-cell repertoire.

Authors:  Nevil J Singh
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 3.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.