Literature DB >> 1437268

Genetic influences upon eosinophilia and resistance in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis.

D A Lammas1, D Wakelin, L A Mitchell, M Tuohy, K J Else, R K Grencis.   

Abstract

Genetic influences upon host variation in eosinophilia and resistance to helminth infection, and the relationship between these parameters, were investigated in 7 inbred and 1 hybrid strains of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis. Clear strain-dependent variations were observed in the maximum peripheral blood, bone marrow and spleen eosinophilia attained in infected animals. SWR, NIH and SJL strains of mice all gave high responses to infection; four congenic strains sharing the B10 background (C57BL10 [B10], B10.S, B10.G and B10.BR) were low responders. Some of the genes for high responsiveness appeared to be dominant, as F1 hybrids from high- and low-response phenotype parental strains showed intermediate to high responses to infection. Intestinal eosinophilia showed no correlation with either peripheral blood or bone marrow responses (NIH and B10 strains having similar levels of eosinophil response in gut tissue) and was unrelated to the level of resistance to infection. Whereas NIH were highly resistant, with adult worm burdens at 13 days post-infection and muscle larval burdens at 35 days post-infection significantly lower than all other strains, B10 were quite susceptible, retaining substantial worm burdens at day 13 and harbouring large numbers of muscle larvae. Measurements of the level of the eosinophilopoietic cytokine IL-5 in sera during infection showed that the two strains differed in the kinetics of release but not in their absolute capacity to produce this cytokine. NIH mice released high levels during a primary infection, B10 released high levels during a secondary infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1437268     DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000073765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitology        ISSN: 0031-1820            Impact factor:   3.234


  8 in total

1.  Differential immune profiles following experimental Echinostoma hortense infection in BALB/c and C3H/HeN mice.

Authors:  Yoon Kyung Cho; Yong Suk Ryang; In Sik Kim; Seung Kyu Park; Jee Aee Im; Kyu Jae Lee
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Immune control of food intake: enteroendocrine cells are regulated by CD4+ T lymphocytes during small intestinal inflammation.

Authors:  J R McDermott; F C Leslie; M D'Amato; D G Thompson; R K Grencis; J T McLaughlin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Leucocyte recruitment during enteric nematode infection.

Authors:  J R McDermott; R K Grencis; K J Else
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 4.  Nematodes and the spleen: an immunological relationship.

Authors:  J L John
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1994-01-15

Review 5.  Eosinophils and helminth infection: protective or pathogenic?

Authors:  E Mitre; A D Klion
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 9.623

6.  Coinfection with Clonorchis sinensis modulates murine host response against Trichinella spiralis infection.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Bo Huang; Shiguang Huang; Xinbing Yu; Yonglong Li; Wenjian Song; Yongxiang Li; Fangli Lu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Mast cells disrupt epithelial barrier function during enteric nematode infection.

Authors:  Jacqueline R McDermott; Ruth E Bartram; Pamela A Knight; Hugh R P Miller; David R Garrod; Richard K Grencis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Communication is key: Innate immune cells regulate host protection to helminths.

Authors:  Jianya Peng; Hannah G Federman; Christina M Hernandez; Mark C Siracusa
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 8.786

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.