Literature DB >> 1437215

The chromosome complement of human gametes.

P A Jacobs.   

Abstract

The comparisons of observed and predicted rates of chromosomally abnormal gametes for two major classes of abnormality and for three specific trisomies are summarized in Table 2.10. As can be seen there is not very good agreement between the two sets of data. For sperm the observed abnormality rates are, with the exception of polyploidy, all in excess of those predicted. For structural abnormalities the excess is absurd and suggests that most structural abnormalities seen in sperm chromosomes may be preparation artefacts. On the other hand, it could be argued that the excess of hyperhaploidy among sperm is real and represents those trisomic conceptuses lost in the early stages of pregnancy. However, both chromosome 21 and the sex chromosomes are represented more often than any other chromosomes. Recent observations among all clinically recognized pregnancies do not suggest an excess of trisomy 21 conceptions arising from non-disjunction in spermatogenesis. As can be seen from Table 2.10, the observed frequencies of trisomy 21 is 10 times greater than that predicted, a difference that seems too great to be accounted for by early pregnancy wastage. While the X chromosome does appear to undergo non-disjunction much more frequently than the autosomes during spermatogenesis, the increase is restricted to non-disjunction of the XY bivalent at the first male meiotic division. In this class the observed and predicted frequencies are rather similar and it is even possible that the observed excess in sperm is accounted for by early post-zygotic loss. However, with the exception of the 24, XY class, the distribution of individual chromosomes among the hyperhaploid sperm bears little relation to that predicted. The most likely explanation for this is that banding of sperm chromosomes is of such poor quality that there are many errors in the identification of individual chromosomes. Most authors use some form of Q banding and this technique should give unequivocal identification of the highly-fluorescent Y chromosome even when other chromosomes are not clearly distinguishable. An increased accuracy of Y-chromosome identification may account for the relative concordance between observed and predicted rates of 24, XY sperm. By the same argument, 24, YY sperm might be expected to be accurately enumerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1437215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oxf Rev Reprod Biol


  29 in total

1.  An Eph receptor sperm-sensing control mechanism for oocyte meiotic maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Michael A Miller; Paul J Ruest; Mary Kosinski; Steven K Hanks; David Greenstein
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  On the paternal origin of trisomy 21 Down syndrome.

Authors:  Maj A Hultén; Suketu D Patel; Magnus Westgren; Nikos Papadogiannakis; Anna Maria Jonsson; Jon Jonasson; Erik Iwarsson
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Shelli R Kesler
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am       Date:  2007-07

4.  Effects of X-monosomy and X-linked imprinting on superior temporal gyrus morphology in Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Shelli R Kesler; Christine M Blasey; Wendy E Brown; Jerome Yankowitz; She Min Zeng; Bruce G Bender; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  TroX: a new method to learn about the genesis of aneuploidy from trisomic products of conception.

Authors:  Amir R Kermany; Laure Segurel; Tiffany R Oliver; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Advanced age increases chromosome structural abnormalities in human spermatozoa.

Authors:  Cristina Templado; Anna Donate; Jesús Giraldo; Mercè Bosch; Anna Estop
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 7.  The control of mammalian female meiosis: factors that influence chromosome segregation.

Authors:  P A Hunt
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Human female meiosis: new insights into an error-prone process.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Dialkyl phosphate urinary metabolites and chromosomal abnormalities in human sperm.

Authors:  Zaida I Figueroa; Heather A Young; John D Meeker; Sheena E Martenies; Dana Boyd Barr; George Gray; Melissa J Perry
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Amygdala and hippocampal volumes in Turner syndrome: a high-resolution MRI study of X-monosomy.

Authors:  Shelli R Kesler; Amy Garrett; Bruce Bender; Jerome Yankowitz; She Min Zeng; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.