Literature DB >> 1437066

Bacterial microleakage of Cavit, IRM, and TERM.

E Deveaux1, P Hildelbert, C Neut, B Boniface, C Romond.   

Abstract

In this in vitro study, a model system was developed and tested to evaluate the sealing ability of temporary restorative materials used in endodontic access preparations. The materials studied, Cavit, IRM, and TERM, were tested on 40 premolars against a known bacterial species, Streptococcus sanguis. The leakage of bacterial cells was checked 4 and 8 days after initial immersion in the culture. Thermocycling was introduced on the fourth day. After 8 days the cement thicknesses were measured after the teeth had been longitudinally sectioned. Before and after thermocycling, IRM was less leakproof than Cavit (p < 0.05) and TERM (p < 0.05). Thermocycling aggravated percolation in the case of IRM, and decreased the tightness of Cavit, whereas TERM remained leakproof. The thicknesses were as follows: Cavit, 3.73 mm; IRM, 3.45 mm; and TERM, 5.49 mm. There was no statistically significant relationship between thickness and tightness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1437066     DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90358-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol        ISSN: 0030-4220


  10 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of microleakage of temporary filling materials used for multivisit endodontic treatment sessions in primary teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  N S V Babu; P V Bhanushali; N V Bhanushali; P Patel
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-04-17

2.  Microcomputed tomography assessment of microcracks following temporary filling placement.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamleh; Alaa Mansour; Doaa Taqi; Hanan Moussa; Faleh Tamimi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Cavity Bases Revisited.

Authors:  Naji Ziad Arandi; Tarek Rabi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2020-07-24

4.  Restoration of endodontically treated teeth review and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Iris Slutzky-Goldberg; Hagay Slutzky; Colin Gorfil; Ami Smidt
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-01-26

5.  A comparison of the sealing ability of various temporary restorative materials to seal the access cavity: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Aji Markose; Ramesh Krishnan; Maya Ramesh; Shishir Singh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016-10

6.  Evaluation of physical-mechanical properties, antibacterial effect, and cytotoxicity of temporary restorative materials.

Authors:  Sonia Luque Peralta; Sávio Bisinoto de Leles; André Lindemann Dutra; Victoria Burmann da Silva Guimarães; Evandro Piva; Rafael Guerra Lund
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Coronal microleakage for readymade and hand mixed temporary filling materials.

Authors:  Hager Ibn Idriss Aledrissy; Neamat Hassan Abubakr; Nadia Ahmed Yahia; Yahia Eltayib Ibrahim
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2011-11-15

8.  Coronal microleakage with five different temporary restorative materials following walking bleach technique: An ex-vivo study.

Authors:  G P V Srikumar; K Ravi Varma; K Harish Shetty; Pramod Kumar
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-10

9.  In Vitro Comparison of Dye Penetration through Four Temporary Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Shahriar Shahi; Mohammad Samiei; Saeed Rahimi; Hossein Nezami
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2010-05-20

10.  Sealing ability of cements in root canals prepared for intraradicular posts.

Authors:  Dirce Haruko Nakamura; Roberto Brandão Garcia; Clóvis Monteiro Bramante; Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes; Norberti Bernadineli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.698

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.