Literature DB >> 1436123

Quest for agonist and antagonist selectivity at muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig smooth muscles and cardiac atria.

N A Dorofeeva1, S A Shelkovnikov, L A Starshinova, A F Danilov, J Nedoma, S Tucek.   

Abstract

Potencies of 11 muscarinic agonists in eliciting contraction of smooth muscle in guinea-pig ileum, trachea, urinary bladder and uterus and in inhibiting the rate of contractions of cardiac atria were compared. While acetylcholine (ACh) was the most potent agonist on the ileum, uterus and cardiac atria, cis-L(+)-dioxolane was equally as potent as ACh on the ileum and more potent on the urinary bladder and trachea. Compared to ACh, methylfurmethide, oxotremorine, acetoxybut-2-inyl-trimethylammonium and cis-L(+)-dioxolane acted weakly on the atria. Aceclidine, arecoline and acetyl-beta-methylcholine displayed selectivity for the urinary bladder and pilocarpine for the tracheal and urinary bladder smooth muscles. Oxotremorine had very low activity on the uterus. The stereoselectivity of muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs) for cis-L(+)-and cis-D(-)-dioxolane was low in the urinary bladder and uterus and high in the ileum and trachea. Most antagonists showed little selectivity between different organs, but S(-)-phenylcyclohexylglycoloyl choline was 6 times more active on the urinary bladder than on the ileum and AF-DX 116 was 12-30 times more active on the atria than on the smooth muscles. Among the N-alkyl derivatives of benzilylcholine, the octyl derivative as 400 times more active on the ileum than on the atria, while among the N-alkyl derivatives of QNB, the N-decyl derivative was 41 times more active on the ileum. The observed differences in the potency of various agonists and their stereoisomers on different smooth muscles cannot be explained by differences in the accessibility of receptors or in receptor reserve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1436123     DOI: 10.1007/bf00171078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.000


  29 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of muscarinic receptors coupled to phosphoinositide breakdown in guinea pig brain and peripheral tissues.

Authors:  L Noronha-Blob; V C Lowe; R C Hanson; D C U'Prichard
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1987-08-24       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 2.  Are receptors promiscuous? Intrinsic efficacy as a transduction phenomenon.

Authors:  T Kenakin
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.037

3.  [A new selective agonist of muscarinic cholinoreceptors].

Authors:  L A Vikhreva; T A Pudova; N N Godovikov; S A Shelkovnikov; L A Starshinova; N A Dorofeeva; M I Kabachnik
Journal:  Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR       Date:  1990

Review 4.  The molecular basis of muscarinic receptor diversity.

Authors:  T I Bonner
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 13.837

5.  Tissue distribution of mRNAs encoding muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes.

Authors:  A Maeda; T Kubo; M Mishina; S Numa
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1988-11-07       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 6.  Are junction potentials essential? Dual mechanism of smooth muscle cell activation by transmitter released from autonomic nerves.

Authors:  T B Bolton; W A Large
Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol       Date:  1986-01

7.  The relative potencies of some agonists at M2 muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig ileum, atria and bronchi.

Authors:  R B Barlow; P Weston-Smith
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists.

Authors:  O ARUNLAKSHANA; H O SCHILD
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol Chemother       Date:  1959-03

9.  Neuromuscular blocking and antimuscarinic activity of a series of bis-atropinium and N-n-alkyl atropinium compounds.

Authors:  D M Green; A W Muir; R A Power; P B Thompson
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.765

10.  Comparative studies of the postjunctional activities of some very potent muscarinic agonists.

Authors:  E Grana; A Lucchelli; F Zonta; M G Santagostino-Barbone; G D'Agostino
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  Activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors via their allosteric binding sites.

Authors:  J Jakubík; L Bacáková; V Lisá; E E el-Fakahany; S Tucek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Characterization of the functional muscarinic receptors in the rat urinary bladder.

Authors:  P A Longhurst; R E Leggett; J A Briscoe
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 8.739

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.