BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Central catheters are an important prerequisite for adequate parenteral nutrition in preterm infants. However, a variety of complications have been shown to be associated with central lines: septicemica, thrombotic complications, mechanical complications. In this retrospective analysis we summarize our recent experience with central silastic catheters. RESULTS: Within a five-year-period (1986-1990). 497 silastic-catheters were inserted in 366 high risk neonates (mean birthweight 1360 g; 1060-1740 g, 25.-75. percentile) treated at the NICU, Department of Pediatrics, University of Göttingen. 451 catheters which were placed in a central position, were removed after an average duration of 11 days (mean; 8-18 days, 25.-75. percentile). During the observation period, 62.8 percent of the catheters were purposely removed. Making use of the Kaplan-Meier-curve, we calculated how long the catheter could stay without complications; 50% of all catheters could be expected to be in place for 25 days. The incidence of septicemia was 1.9%, bacterial contamination of the catheters was evident in 22% of all central lines. The most predominant microorganisms responsible for catheter-contamination were coagulase-negative staphylococci. In addition, catheters were removed because of signs of phlebitis or suspected thrombotic complications (11.1%), and mechanical complications (dislocation, occlusion; 11.7%). Due to malposition of the central catheter two preterm infants developed pericardial effusions. There was no correlation between the site where the catheter was inserted and these complications. CONCLUSION: Central silastic catheters wherever clinically indicated are a valuable adjunct in the parenteral nutrition on high risk neonates.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Central catheters are an important prerequisite for adequate parenteral nutrition in preterm infants. However, a variety of complications have been shown to be associated with central lines: septicemica, thrombotic complications, mechanical complications. In this retrospective analysis we summarize our recent experience with central silastic catheters. RESULTS: Within a five-year-period (1986-1990). 497 silastic-catheters were inserted in 366 high risk neonates (mean birthweight 1360 g; 1060-1740 g, 25.-75. percentile) treated at the NICU, Department of Pediatrics, University of Göttingen. 451 catheters which were placed in a central position, were removed after an average duration of 11 days (mean; 8-18 days, 25.-75. percentile). During the observation period, 62.8 percent of the catheters were purposely removed. Making use of the Kaplan-Meier-curve, we calculated how long the catheter could stay without complications; 50% of all catheters could be expected to be in place for 25 days. The incidence of septicemia was 1.9%, bacterial contamination of the catheters was evident in 22% of all central lines. The most predominant microorganisms responsible for catheter-contamination were coagulase-negative staphylococci. In addition, catheters were removed because of signs of phlebitis or suspected thrombotic complications (11.1%), and mechanical complications (dislocation, occlusion; 11.7%). Due to malposition of the central catheter two preterm infants developed pericardial effusions. There was no correlation between the site where the catheter was inserted and these complications. CONCLUSION: Central silastic catheters wherever clinically indicated are a valuable adjunct in the parenteral nutrition on high risk neonates.