Literature DB >> 1435269

The effects of syntactic structure on letter detection in adjacent function words.

S N Greenberg1, A Koriat, A Shapiro.   

Abstract

In the present study, we examined letter detection in very frequent function-word sequences. It has been claimed that such sequences are processed in a unitized manner, thus preempting access to their constituent letters. In contrast, we showed that letter detection in the words for and the (1) was no more difficult when the words appeared in adjacent locations in a sentence (familiar) than when they appeared apart (less familiar sequence) and (2) was contingent upon the words' syntactic roles within the phrase. Thus, letter detection in for was easier when the sequence was separated by a clause boundary than when the words were part of the same clause. The advantage derived from clause separation was strongest when a comma divided clauses. These results challenge the unitization account of the "missing-letter" effect in common phrases and support a position where this phenomenon is seen to reflect the extraction of phrase structure during reading.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1435269     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Structure in language. Creating form in talk.

Authors:  K Bock
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-11

2.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-11

4.  Acquisition and retention of a letter-detection skill.

Authors:  A F Healy; D W Fendrich; J D Proctor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A secondary-task analysis of a word familiarity effect.

Authors:  J D Proctor; A F Healy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Detecting letters in continuous text: effects of display size.

Authors:  A F Healy; W L Oliver; T P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Detection of Fs in a single statement: the role of phonetic recoding.

Authors:  J D Read
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-07

8.  Phonetic factors in letter detection: a reevaluation.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-03

9.  An acoustic factor in letter cancellation.

Authors:  D W Corcoran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1966-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Letter detection in very familiar texts.

Authors:  S N Greenberg; J Tai
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

2.  Effects of grammatical categories on letter detection in continuous text.

Authors:  Denis Foucambert; Michael Zuniga
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-02

3.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text.

Authors:  A F Healy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-09

4.  The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors.

Authors:  A Koriat; S N Greenberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.