Literature DB >> 1435177

EMG and mechanical changes during sprint starts at different front block obliquities.

N Guissard1, J Duchateau, K Hainaut.   

Abstract

The effect of decreased front block obliquity on start velocity was studied during sprint starts. The electromyographic (EMG) activity of the medial gastrocnemius (MG), the soleus (Sol), and the vastus medialis (VM) was recorded and analyzed at a 70 degrees, a 50 degrees, and a 30 degrees angle between the foot plate surface and the horizontal. Integrated EMGs (IEMG) were compared with muscle length changes in the MG and Sol in relation to foot and knee movements. The results indicate that decreasing front block obliquity significantly (P < 0.05) increases the start velocity without any change to the total duration of the pushing phase and the overall EMG activity. This improvement in sprint start performance is associated with the enhanced contribution of the MG during eccentric and concentric phases of calf muscles contraction. In the "set position" the initial length of MG and Sol is increased at 50 degrees and 30 degrees as compared with 70 degrees. The subsequent stretch-shortening cycle is improved and contributes more effectively to the speed of the muscle shortening. Moreover, lengthening these muscles during the eccentric phase stretches the muscle spindles, and the reflex activities that contribute to the observed increase in the MG IEMG, are present when the slope of the block is reduced. The results indicate that decreasing front block obliquity induces neural and mechanical modifications that contribute to increasing the sprint start velocity without any increase in the duration of the pushing phase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1435177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  13 in total

1.  Kinematics of the typical beach flags start for young adult sprinters.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; William M Vickery; Xanne A K Janse de Jonge
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Biomechanics of the sprint start.

Authors:  M J Harland; J R Steele
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Optimisation of sprinting performance in running, cycling and speed skating.

Authors:  G J van Ingen Schenau; J J de Koning; G de Groot
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Biomechanical Performance Factors in the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria João Valamatos; João M Abrantes; Filomena Carnide; Maria-José Valamatos; Cristina P Monteiro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Biomechanical Differences in the Sprint Start Between Faster and Slower High-Level Sprinters.

Authors:  Milan Čoh; Stanislav Peharec; Petar Bačić; Krzyszfof Mackala
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Anthropometry-driven block setting improves starting block performance in sprinters.

Authors:  Valentina Cavedon; Marco Sandri; Mariola Pirlo; Nicola Petrone; Carlo Zancanaro; Chiara Milanese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Biomechanics of the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Neil Edward Bezodis; Steffen Willwacher; Aki Ilkka Tapio Salo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Effect of a Wide Stance on Block Start Performance in Sprint Running.

Authors:  Mitsuo Otsuka; Toshiyuki Kurihara; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Kinematics that differentiate the beach flags start between elite and non-elite sprinters.

Authors:  R G Lockie; W M Vickery
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.806

10.  Certain Actions from the Functional Movement Screen Do Not Provide an Indication of Dynamic Stability.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; Samuel J Callaghan; Corrin A Jordan; Tawni M Luczo; Matthew D Jeffriess; Farzad Jalilvand; Adrian B Schultz
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.