Literature DB >> 1434967

Incorporating practice costs into the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

E A Latimer1, E R Becker.   

Abstract

Practice costs (not including liability insurance costs) account for approximately 41% of the payment for medical and surgical services in the Medicare Fee Schedule. Unlike the portion of the fee schedule that compensates physicians for their work, the practice cost portion of the Medicare Fee Schedule is not resource-based; it is based instead on historical charges. As a result, physicians can recover their practice costs in less time and with less effort (measured in work relative value units) by performing invasive procedures and tests than by providing evaluation and management services. The Physician Payment Review Commission has proposed, in some detail, a method for incorporating practice costs into the Medicare Fee Schedule. The method involves allocating indirect costs on the basis of physician work plus direct costs. We find, using their own analytical framework, that indirect costs should rather be allocated on the basis of time. But to better serve the goal of incentive neutrality, and to make practice cost payments more equitable, the payment a physician receives for practice costs should be based not on service mix and volume, but on characteristics of the physician's practice more closely related to practice costs: for example, whether the physician has an office, or whether the physician practices alone or in a group.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1434967     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199211001-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the LIFE Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults at Increased Risk for Mobility Disability.

Authors:  Erik J Groessl; Robert M Kaplan; Cynthia M Castro Sweet; Timothy Church; Mark A Espeland; Thomas M Gill; Nancy W Glynn; Abby C King; Stephen Kritchevsky; Todd Manini; Mary M McDermott; Kieran F Reid; Julia Rushing; Marco Pahor
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  A cost analysis of a physical activity intervention for older adults.

Authors:  Erik J Groessl; Robert M Kaplan; Steven N Blair; W Jack Rejeski; Jeffrey A Katula; Abby C King; Roger A Fielding; Nancy W Glynn; Marco Pahor
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2009-11

3.  Costs associated with the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the diabetes prevention program.

Authors:  William H Hernan; Michael Brandle; Ping Zhang; David F Williamson; Margaret J Matulik; Robert E Ratner; John M Lachin; Michael M Engelgau
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Allocating practice expense under the Medicare fee schedule.

Authors:  G C Pope; R T Burge
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1993

6.  Practice expenses in the MFS (Medicare fee schedule): the service-class approach.

Authors:  E A Latimer; N M Kane
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1995

7.  Cost analysis of rapid diagnostics for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Naomi Hillery; Andre Trollip; Roberta L Jackson; Donald G Catanzaro; Timothy C Rodwell; Richard S Garfein; Camilla Rodrigues; Valeriu Crudu; Thomas C Victor; Antonino Catanzaro
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.090

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.