Literature DB >> 1434673

Intron evolution: a statistical comparison of two models.

A M Nyberg1, M B Cronhjort.   

Abstract

The two most frequently occurring explanations for the existence and distribution of introns in the genes of different species are: (1) introns are remnants of the original genetic material. (2) Introns were introduced during evolution. We construct mathematical models corresponding to these two explanations, and calculate the probabilities that the intron distribution in genes from different species coding for actin, alpha-tubulin, triosephosphate isomerase and superoxide dismutase are described by these models. In both models, the branch lengths as well as the structure of the corresponding evolutionary tree is taken into account. Every branch in the evolutionary tree is assumed to have its own individual rate of loss of introns for the first model and rate of gain of introns for the second model. These rate constants are estimated from the actual number of introns. Using the rate constants we stimulate the intron evolution and calculate the probabilities that the actual intron arrangements are produced. The results for actin and alpha-tubulin, which are the two genes we have the most data for, favor the model corresponding conjecture (1), i.e. the idea that introns are old. This contradicts the results from an earlier attempt to model intron evolution where almost the same data was used (Dibb & Newman, 1989, EMBO J. 8, 2015-2021).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1434673     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80619-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  2 in total

1.  Rates of intron loss and gain: implications for early eukaryotic evolution.

Authors:  Scott William Roy; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Exon/intron structure of aldehyde dehydrogenase genes supports the "introns-late" theory.

Authors:  A Rzhetsky; F J Ayala; L C Hsu; C Chang; A Yoshida
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.