BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) show small increases in risk of disease associated with certain occupations and chemical exposures. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether the presence of mutationally activated ras oncogenes in AML are associated with occupational and chemical exposures. METHODS: We interviewed 62 patients with newly diagnosed AML (or their next-of-kin), all of whom were enrolled in a national multicenter clinical trial, and 630 healthy control subjects. DNA extracted from patients' pretreatment bone marrow samples was amplified by using the polymerase chain reaction and probed with allele-specific oligonucleotides for activating point mutations at the 12th, 13th, and 61st codons of three protooncogenes: H-ras (also known as HRAS), K-ras (also known as KRAS2), and N-ras (also known as NRAS). RESULTS: Patients with ras mutation-positive AML had a higher frequency (six of 10 patients) of working 5 or more years in an a priori high-risk occupation than did patients with ras mutation-negative AML (eight of 52; odds ratio [OR] = 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-36). Patients with ras mutation-positive AML were more likely than patients with ras mutation-negative AML to have breathed chemical vapor on the job (OR = 9.1; 95% CI = 1.3-64) or to have had skin contact with chemicals (OR = 6.9; 95% CI = 1.3-37). When ras-positive patients were compared with healthy control subjects, the ORs for occupation and occupational exposures remained elevated, while patients with ras mutation-negative AML showed no increased risk when compared with control subjects. CONCLUSION: Activation of ras proto-oncogenes may identify an etiologic subgroup of AML caused by occupation and chemical exposure. IMPLICATION: Disease etiology may be better understood if epidemiologic measures of exposure are integrated with molecular assays of the genetic defects responsible for cancer initiation and promotion.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) show small increases in risk of disease associated with certain occupations and chemical exposures. PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether the presence of mutationally activated ras oncogenes in AML are associated with occupational and chemical exposures. METHODS: We interviewed 62 patients with newly diagnosed AML (or their next-of-kin), all of whom were enrolled in a national multicenter clinical trial, and 630 healthy control subjects. DNA extracted from patients' pretreatment bone marrow samples was amplified by using the polymerase chain reaction and probed with allele-specific oligonucleotides for activating point mutations at the 12th, 13th, and 61st codons of three protooncogenes: H-ras (also known as HRAS), K-ras (also known as KRAS2), and N-ras (also known as NRAS). RESULTS:Patients with ras mutation-positive AML had a higher frequency (six of 10 patients) of working 5 or more years in an a priori high-risk occupation than did patients with ras mutation-negative AML (eight of 52; odds ratio [OR] = 6.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-36). Patients with ras mutation-positive AML were more likely than patients with ras mutation-negative AML to have breathed chemical vapor on the job (OR = 9.1; 95% CI = 1.3-64) or to have had skin contact with chemicals (OR = 6.9; 95% CI = 1.3-37). When ras-positive patients were compared with healthy control subjects, the ORs for occupation and occupational exposures remained elevated, while patients with ras mutation-negative AML showed no increased risk when compared with control subjects. CONCLUSION: Activation of ras proto-oncogenes may identify an etiologic subgroup of AML caused by occupation and chemical exposure. IMPLICATION: Disease etiology may be better understood if epidemiologic measures of exposure are integrated with molecular assays of the genetic defects responsible for cancer initiation and promotion.
Authors: Brian C-H Chiu; Bhavana J Dave; Aaron Blair; Susan M Gapstur; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Dennis D Weisenburger Journal: Blood Date: 2006-04-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Maneet Kaur; Adam J de Smith; Steve Selvin; Luoping Zhang; Marc Cunningham; Michelle W Kang; Helen M Hansen; Robert M Cooper; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Joseph L Wiemels; Catherine Metayer Journal: Arch Med Res Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.235