Literature DB >> 1432867

The effects of suggestion on airways of asthmatic subjects breathing room air as a suggested bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator.

S A Isenberg1, P M Lehrer, S Hochron.   

Abstract

Thirty-three asthmatic subjects were told they were receiving, alternately, an inhaled bronchoconstrictor and inhaled bronchodilator, although they actually were only breathing room air. No subjects showed suggestion-produced effects on FEV1, although two (of the 19 on whom FEF50 was measured) showed effects of greater than 20% on measures of maximal midexpiratory flow. The incidence of the effect is smaller than reported previously, possibly because some subjects in previous studies inhaled saline, a mild bronchoconstrictor, and reversal of effect was not required for classification as a reactor. Higher percentages of subjects in this study showed decreased MMEF in response to the 'bronchoconstrictor', but this appeared to reflect fatigue rather than suggestion effects. However, the fact that the effect occurred in a relatively non-effort-dependent measure suggests that real changes occurred in bronchial caliber, not just in test effort. Suggestion had a significant effect on perception of bronchial changes, but the correlation between actual and perceived changes was minimal. There was an increase in FVC prior to administration of the 'bronchoconstrictor', possibly reflecting a preparatory response to the expected drug. Correlations among self-report variables suggested the existence of three personality dimensions among our population related to suggestion and asthma: cognitive susceptibility to suggestion of bronchial change; feeling of physical vulnerability; and anxiety. However, there was no significant relationship between airway response to suggested changes and hypnotic susceptibility, as measured by the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1432867     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90135-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  6 in total

1.  Active albuterol or placebo, sham acupuncture, or no intervention in asthma.

Authors:  Michael E Wechsler; John M Kelley; Ingrid O E Boyd; Stefanie Dutile; Gautham Marigowda; Irving Kirsch; Elliot Israel; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The placebo effect in asthma.

Authors:  Stefanie Dutile; Ted J Kaptchuk; Michael E Wechsler
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Psycho-Neuro-Endocrine-Immunological Basis of the Placebo Effect: Potential Applications beyond Pain Therapy.

Authors:  Ángel Ortega; Juan Salazar; Néstor Galban; Milagros Rojas; Daniela Ariza; Mervin Chávez-Castillo; Manuel Nava; Manuel E Riaño-Garzón; Edgar Alexis Díaz-Camargo; Oscar Medina-Ortiz; Valmore Bermúdez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Breathlessness and the brain: the role of expectation.

Authors:  Lucy L Marlow; Olivia K Faull; Sarah L Finnegan; Kyle T S Pattinson
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.302

5.  Increasing the Effectiveness of a Physical Activity Smartphone Intervention With Positive Suggestions: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Aleksandrina Skvortsova; Talia Cohen Rodrigues; David de Buisonjé; Tobias Kowatsch; Prabhakaran Santhanam; Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Henriët van Middendorp; Andrea Evers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 7.076

6.  Nocebo Effects of Clinical Communication and Placebo Effects of Positive Suggestions on Respiratory Muscle Strength.

Authors:  Nina Zech; Leoni Scharl; Milena Seemann; Michael Pfeifer; Ernil Hansen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.