| Literature DB >> 14323656 |
Abstract
When the practices of four general practitioners, members of multispecialist-general practitioner salaried groups (clinic doctors) were compared with those of four independent general practitioners (solo practitioners), it was noted that: group practice patients had more office laboratory investigation and greater in-hospital consultation and referral. On the other hand, independent practitioners' patients seemed to receive more personal attention from the doctor, a fuller explanation of diagnosis and treatment during office hours, more drug samples and more laboratory investigation in hospital.Group and independent practices are similar with respect to the rate of follow-up visits, the volume of preventive medicine, the number of radiographs and special procedures, the total number of drugs ordered, and the in-hospital formal written consultation rate and office consultation rate.The similarities between two types of practice may be a result of the interaction of group and independent practice in the same community.It is concluded that the team approach to medical care is not incompatible with independent practice.Entities:
Keywords: CANADA; DIAGNOSIS; DRUG THERAPY; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROUP PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS
Mesh:
Year: 1965 PMID: 14323656 PMCID: PMC1928546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can Med Assoc J ISSN: 0008-4409 Impact factor: 8.262