Literature DB >> 14323656

THE INFLUENCES OF GROUP AND INDEPENDENT GENERAL PRACTICE ON PATIENT CARE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN ONTARIO.

E M SELLERS.   

Abstract

When the practices of four general practitioners, members of multispecialist-general practitioner salaried groups (clinic doctors) were compared with those of four independent general practitioners (solo practitioners), it was noted that: group practice patients had more office laboratory investigation and greater in-hospital consultation and referral. On the other hand, independent practitioners' patients seemed to receive more personal attention from the doctor, a fuller explanation of diagnosis and treatment during office hours, more drug samples and more laboratory investigation in hospital.Group and independent practices are similar with respect to the rate of follow-up visits, the volume of preventive medicine, the number of radiographs and special procedures, the total number of drugs ordered, and the in-hospital formal written consultation rate and office consultation rate.The similarities between two types of practice may be a result of the interaction of group and independent practice in the same community.It is concluded that the team approach to medical care is not incompatible with independent practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CANADA; DIAGNOSIS; DRUG THERAPY; GENERAL PRACTICE; GROUP PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS

Mesh:

Year:  1965        PMID: 14323656      PMCID: PMC1928546     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  6 in total

1.  GENERAL PRACTICE IN THE UNITED STATES.

Authors:  K L WHITE
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1964-04

2.  Symposium on medical education--No.3. I. The future of family practice. The present scene--trends in medical practice.

Authors:  H G WEISKOTTEN
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The 1959 survey of group practice.

Authors:  S D POMRINSE; M S GOLDSTEIN
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1961-05

4.  Comparison of prematurity and perinatal mortality in a general population and in the population of a prepaid group practice, medical care plan.

Authors:  S SHAPIRO; L WEINER; P M DENSEN
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1958-02

5.  A field survey of general practice, 1951-2.

Authors:  S J HADFIELD
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1953-09-26

6.  A New Vaginal Retractor.

Authors:  H L White
Journal:  Cal West Med       Date:  1933-11
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  A measure of a family doctor's work. Part II: drugs, time, charges, morbidity.

Authors:  J A Collyer
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1975-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The leaven of science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1966-04-09       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prescribing by canadian general practitioners: review of the english language literature.

Authors:  J Lexchin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The characteristics of internists in three prepaid group practices.

Authors:  E Vayda; P Kopplin
Journal:  Health Serv Rep       Date:  1973 Jun-Jul

5.  Family practice: a proposed solution to the problem of meeting the medical needs of the community.

Authors:  R G McAuley
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1967-04-08       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Relation between physician characteristics and prescribing for elderly people in New Brunswick.

Authors:  W Davidson; D W Molloy; G Somers; M Bédard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Group practice impacts on patients, physicians and healthcare systems: a scoping review.

Authors:  Terry Zwiep; San Hilalion Ahn; Jamie Brehaut; Fady Balaa; Daniel I McIsaac; Susan Rich; Tom Wallace; Husein Moloo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.