Literature DB >> 1431745

Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling.

L T DeCarlo1.   

Abstract

The intertrial interval (ITI) was varied within subjects in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching experiments. Fits of a recently proposed time series regression model show that the influence of the previous stimulus intensity on the current response decreases when the ITI is increased. The results can be interpreted as showing that an assimilative or additive perceptual or memory effect decreases with an increase in ITI. Fits of an earlier model, on the other hand, suggest that the influence of the previous stimulus intensity increases with an increase in ITI, which is counter to expectations. The new regression model (a) provides a simple explanation for the counterintuitive results obtained with the earlier model, (b) shows that assimilation in perception or memory can appear as contrast, and (c) reduces to a simpler model for longer ITIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1431745     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Flavor-intensity perception: effects of stimulus context.

Authors:  Lawrence E Marks; Timothy G Shepard; Kelly Burger; Emily M Chakwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-10

2.  Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian?

Authors:  Kevin M Sailor; Miriam Antoine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

3.  The influence of trial-to-trial recalibration on sequential effects in cross-modality matching.

Authors:  Martha Teghtsoonian; Robert Teghtsoonian; Lawrence T DeCarlo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-15

4.  Pure feedback effects in absolute identification.

Authors:  S Mori; L M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-10

5.  Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Adam Y Shavit; Maria G Veldhuizen; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  On the difficulty to think in ratios: a methodological bias in Stevens' magnitude estimation procedure.

Authors:  Alica Mertens; Ulf K Mertens; Veronika Lerche
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Modeling sequential context effects in diagnostic interpretation of screening mammograms.

Authors:  Folami Alamudun; Paige Paulus; Hong-Jun Yoon; Georgia Tourassi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.