Literature DB >> 1431710

Projections of cervical cancer mortality and incidence in New Zealand: the possible impact of screening.

B Cox1, D C Skegg.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to estimate the likely burden of cervical cancer in New Zealand over the next two decades, according to whether cervical screening services are made more effective.
DESIGN: The study was based on national mortality and incidence data for the periods 1954-87 and 1954-86, respectively. An age-period-cohort model was used to estimate the contributions of age, time period, and birth cohort effects to the occurrence of cervical cancer. Using age specific estimates of the future female population of New Zealand, projections of cervical cancer mortality and incidence until the year 2008 were derived from the model. Projections were made assuming either that screening services will not be improved, or that an immediate improvement in the organisation of screening will lead to a decline in period effects for incidence of 15% per five year time period (with a slightly delayed effect on mortality). It was also assumed either that the risk in new birth cohorts will be similar to that in recent cohorts, or that their risk will be halved as a result of changes in sexual behaviour (due to education about AIDS or other factors). Combining these assumptions produced four sets of estimates, reflecting a range of possible scenarios.
SETTING: Both the data used and the projections obtained related to the entire population of New Zealand women. MAIN
RESULTS: For both mortality and incidence, projections were made of age specific rates, cumulative rates, and absolute numbers of deaths or new cases. With the first assumption about new birth cohorts, it was estimated that both mortality and incidence rates will increase if screening services are are not improved. In absolute terms, the present 100 deaths per year could increase to about 148 deaths per year, while there could be a much larger increase in incidence from 235 per year to about 440 per year). With improved screening, there could be a reduction in age specific mortality rates and a modest decline in the number of deaths, while a reduction in incidence rates would be accompanied by about the same number of new cases as at present. In comparison with improvements in screening, changes in the underlying risk in new birth cohorts would have much smaller effects on the occurrence of cervical cancer over the next two decades.
CONCLUSIONS: Plausible improvements in cervical screening are likely to be accompanied by only small changes in the burden of cervical cancer over the next two decades. If screening services are not improved, however, there will be striking increases in both mortality and incidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1431710      PMCID: PMC1059603          DOI: 10.1136/jech.46.4.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  8 in total

1.  Trends in cervical cancer in New Zealand.

Authors:  B Cox; D C Skegg
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1986-10-22

2.  Using age, period and cohort models to estimate future mortality rates.

Authors:  C Osmond
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales.

Authors:  D M Parkin; X Nguyen-Dinh; N E Day
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-02

4.  Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes.

Authors:  E Lăără; N E Day; M Hakama
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Frequency of cervical smear-tests among patients of general practitioners.

Authors:  J A Dickinson; S R Leeder; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1988-02-01       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Cervical cancer screening and registration--are they working?

Authors:  A Choyce; B R McAvoy
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  1991 cervical screening recommendations: a working group report.

Authors:  C Paul; S Bagshaw; R Bonita; G Durham; N W Fitzgerald; R W Jones; B Marshall; B R McAvoy
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1991-07-10

8.  The application of age, period and cohort models to predict Swiss cancer mortality.

Authors:  E Negri; C La Vecchia; F Levi; A Randriamiharisoa; A Decarli; P Boyle
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Effects of screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New South Wales implied by influences of period of diagnosis and birth cohort.

Authors:  R J Taylor; S L Morrell; H A Mamoon; G V Wain
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Cervical and anal HPV infection: cytological and histological abnormalities in HIV-infected women in Thailand.

Authors:  Reshmie A Ramautarsing; Nittaya Phanuphak; Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana; Ferdinand Wnm Wit; Nipat Teeratakulpisarn; Tippawan Pankam; Piyanee Rodbamrung; Janneke H Wijgert; Joep Ma Lange; Praphan Phanuphak; Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Stephen Kerr; Jintanat Ananworanich
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Elisabete Weiderpass; Laia Bruni; Silvia de Sanjosé; Mona Saraiya; Jacques Ferlay; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 26.763

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.