Literature DB >> 1431667

Moving forward in bioethical theory: theories, cases, and specified principlism.

D Degrazia1.   

Abstract

The field of bioethics has deployed different models of justification for particular moral judgments. The best known models are those of deductivism, casuistry, and principlism (under one, rather limited interpretation). Each of these models, however, has significant difficulties that are explored in this essay. An alternative model, suggested by the work of Henry Richardson, is presented. It is argued that specified principlism is the most promising model of justification in bioethics.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Philosophical Approach; Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Beauchamp, T.L.; Childress, J.F.)

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1431667     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/17.5.511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  13 in total

1.  Ethics in epidemiology and public health I. Technical terms.

Authors:  D L Weed; R E McKeown
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Theoretical and practical problems with wide reflective equilibrium in bioethics.

Authors:  Carson Strong
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2010-04

Review 3.  What kind of doing is clinical ethics?

Authors:  George J Agich
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Intuition and the junctures of judgment in decision procedures for clinical ethics.

Authors:  John K Davis
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007-03-09

5.  "Oh, that's a really hard question": Australian findings on ethical reflection in an accident and emergency ward.

Authors:  Pam McGrath; David Henderson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2008-12

6.  How Many Principles for Public Health Ethics?

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Open Public Health J       Date:  2008-01-01

7.  The casuistic method of practical ethics.

Authors:  Georg Spielthenner
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2016-10

Review 8.  Bioethics methods in the ethical, legal, and social implications of the human genome project literature.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Clair Morrissey
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities in R&D networks.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Poiesis Prax       Date:  2010-09-16

10.  Advocating mandatory patient 'autonomy' in healthcare: adverse reactions and side effects.

Authors:  Myfanwy Davies; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.