G E Sanders1, D A Lawson. 1. Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, MO 62006-1065.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The following studies were performed in order to evaluate the stability of paraspinal tissue compliance measurements. Tissue compliance is a measure of the consistency or firmness of soft tissue and is determined by a hand-held tissue compliance meter. DESIGN: Descriptive and blinded time course intervention measurements. SETTING: All measurements were performed on subjects placed in the prone position on flat tables in a laboratory setting. PARTICIPANTS: Forty asymptomatic volunteer subjects. INTERVENTION: Tissue compliance measurements of the T6 and L3 paraspinal regions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tissue compliance measurements recorded as millimeters of penetration of a metered probe. RESULTS: Data from this study indicate that paraspinal tissue compliance at the T6 and L3 regions does not change significantly over a 10-min interval, is not effected by the testing intervention and the number of abnormal left/right tissue compliance asymmetries is appropriate (5%) for a normal population of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings tend to support the utility of tissue compliance as a possible tool for the evaluation of paraspinal soft tissue.
OBJECTIVE: The following studies were performed in order to evaluate the stability of paraspinal tissue compliance measurements. Tissue compliance is a measure of the consistency or firmness of soft tissue and is determined by a hand-held tissue compliance meter. DESIGN: Descriptive and blinded time course intervention measurements. SETTING: All measurements were performed on subjects placed in the prone position on flat tables in a laboratory setting. PARTICIPANTS: Forty asymptomatic volunteer subjects. INTERVENTION: Tissue compliance measurements of the T6 and L3 paraspinal regions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Tissue compliance measurements recorded as millimeters of penetration of a metered probe. RESULTS: Data from this study indicate that paraspinal tissue compliance at the T6 and L3 regions does not change significantly over a 10-min interval, is not effected by the testing intervention and the number of abnormal left/right tissue compliance asymmetries is appropriate (5%) for a normal population of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings tend to support the utility of tissue compliance as a possible tool for the evaluation of paraspinal soft tissue.