Literature DB >> 1430315

Müller cells in vascular and avascular retinae: a survey of seven mammals.

Z Dreher1, S R Robinson, C Distler.   

Abstract

Eight monoclonal antibodies were used to label Müller cells in four mammals that have vascular retinae (cats, dogs, humans, and rats) and in three with avascular retinae (echidnas, guinea pigs, and rabbits). Müller cells were found to have a fairly uniform retinal distribution in seven species, with a mean density of 8,000-13,000 cells mm-2. Müller cells in avascular retinae differ from their vascular counterparts in four respects. First, they are shorter than those in vascular retinae. This difference is mainly due to a reduction in the thickness of the outer nuclear layer. Second, the trunks of Müller cells in avascular retinae tend to be thicker, although those in echidnas are an exception to this trend. Third, Müller cell rootlets in avascular retinae follow a more tortuous course than those in vascular retinae, reflecting the fact that photoreceptor nuclei in the two types of retina have different shapes and stacking patterns. Fourth, due to a reduction in the density of photoreceptors in avascular retinae, there are fewer neurones per Müller cell. Although these four features may enable Müller cells to assist the nutrition of neurones in the inner layers of avascular retinae, they are unlikely to be morphological specializations that have evolved for that purpose. Rather, these features appear to be a direct consequence of the fact that avascular retinae are thinner and have a differently organised outer nuclear layer. These features aside, Müller cells in avascular retinae closely resemble their counterparts in vascular retinae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1430315     DOI: 10.1002/cne.903230106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  18 in total

1.  Agenesis of retinal vessels in a newborn with central nervous system developmental abnormality.

Authors:  Pinar Altiaylik Ozer; Emrah Utku Kabatas; Bengi Ece Kurtul; Cigdem Seher Kasapkara
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Spectral selectivity model for light transmission by the intermediate filaments in Müller cells.

Authors:  Igor Khmelinskii; Tatiana Golubeva; Elena Korneeva; Mikhail Inyushin; Lidia Zueva; Vladimir Makarov
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 6.252

3.  Abnormal vascularization in mouse retina with dysregulated retinal cholesterol homeostasis.

Authors:  Saida Omarova; Casey D Charvet; Rachel E Reem; Natalia Mast; Wenchao Zheng; Suber Huang; Neal S Peachey; Irina A Pikuleva
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Monocular focal retinal lesions induce short-term topographic plasticity in adult cat visual cortex.

Authors:  M B Calford; L M Schmid; M G Rosa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The cone-specific visual cycle.

Authors:  Jin-Shan Wang; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Defective formation of the inner limiting membrane in laminin beta2- and gamma3-null mice produces retinal dysplasia.

Authors:  Germán Pinzón-Duarte; Gerard Daly; Yong N Li; Manuel Koch; William J Brunken
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Activity-dependent expression of acyl-coenzyme a-binding protein in retinal muller glial cells evoked by optokinetic stimulation.

Authors:  Neal H Barmack; Timothy R Bilderback; Henry Liu; Zuyuan Qian; Vadim Yakhnitsa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Diabetes-induced dysfunction of retinal Müller cells.

Authors:  Donald G Puro
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2002

9.  Müller cell metabolic chaos during retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Mineo Kondo; Hiroko Terasaki; Bryan W Jones
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Differential expression of GFAP in early v late AMD: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  K H C Wu; M C Madigan; F A Billson; P L Penfold
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.