Literature DB >> 1428774

Clinical audit in intensive care--the Meath Intensive Care Audit.

D Mannion1, C Armstrong, B O'Hare, A Feerick, G J Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

Audit is now recognised as being an essential component of clinical practice. We report on the first year of the Meath Intensive Care Audit (MICA). This audit was instituted to investigate the activity of the unit, to assess the feasibility of continuous audit in our ICU and to provide data for future development of ICU facilities. Two hundred and fifty four patients were admitted between July 1st 1990 and June 30th 1991. The mean age at admission was 58 years and the mean length of stay 5.2 days. The mean APACHE II score was 16. Thirty four patients (13.4%) died in the ICU and 17 patients died in hospital following discharge from the unit bringing the hospital mortality rate to 20%. The audit proved feasible to implement and data collection is now accepted as a routine part of our ICU work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1428774     DOI: 10.1007/bf02942122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  10 in total

1.  Admission source to the medical intensive care unit predicts hospital death independent of APACHE II score.

Authors:  J J Escarce; M A Kelley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Validation of a severity of illness score (APACHE II) in a surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  G Giangiuliani; A Mancini; D Gui
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  An evaluation of the costs and outcome of adult intensive care in two units in the UK.

Authors:  A M Shiell; R D Griffiths; A I Short; J Spiby
Journal:  Clin Intensive Care       Date:  1990

4.  APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Outcome and costs of intensive care. A follow-up study on 238 ICU-patients.

Authors:  J L Bams; D R Miranda
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Medical intensive care: indications, interventions, and outcomes.

Authors:  G E Thibault; A G Mulley; G O Barnett; R L Goldstein; V A Reder; E L Sherman; E R Skinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Current practice regarding invasive monitoring in intensive care units in Finland. A nationwide study of the uses of arterial, pulmonary artery and central venous catheters and their effect on outcome. The Finnish Intensive Care Study Group.

Authors:  E Saarela; A Kari; P Nikki; V Rauhala; E Iisalo; L Kaukinen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Patient selection for intensive care: a comparison of New Zealand and United States hospitals.

Authors:  J E Zimmerman; W A Knaus; J A Judson; J H Havill; R V Trubuhovich; E A Draper; D P Wagner
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Audit of intensive care: a 30 month experience using the Apache II severity of disease classification system.

Authors:  S Jacobs; R W Chang; B Lee; B Lee
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.