Literature DB >> 14281726

INTRACRANIAL REINFORCEMENT COMPARED WITH SUGAR-WATER REINFORCEMENT.

W E GIBSON, L D REID, M SAKAI, P B PORTER.   

Abstract

Three ways in which electrical, intracranial reinforcement is reputed to differ from conventional reinforcement were tested in an experiment which equated the form of the responses being reinforced and the response-reinforcement relation. Four groups of rats performed instrumental or consummatory responses reinforced by intracranial reinforcement or sugar. In no comparison did the kind of reinforcement produce a difference, but in every comparison the kind of response reinforced did produce a difference. It is inferred that reputed differences between intracranial reinforcement and conventional reinforcement are artifacts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RATS; REINFORCEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1965        PMID: 14281726     DOI: 10.1126/science.148.3675.1357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  4 in total

1.  Sign-tracking (autoshaping) in rats: a comparison of cocaine and food as unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  David N Kearns; Stanley J Weiss
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  A simple technique for delivering liquids directly to the mouth of an unrestrained rat.

Authors:  D M Gross; M A Trapold; T S Hyde
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Dopaminergic lesions of the dorsolateral striatum in rats increase delay discounting in an impulsive choice task.

Authors:  Stephanie E Tedford; Amanda L Persons; T Celeste Napier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A behavioral task for investigating action discovery, selection and switching: comparison between types of reinforcer.

Authors:  Simon D Fisher; Jason P Gray; Melony J Black; Jennifer R Davies; Jeffery G Bednark; Peter Redgrave; Elizabeth A Franz; Wickliffe C Abraham; John N J Reynolds
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.