Literature DB >> 1427541

[The tensile strength of bracket adhesives depending on the adhesive layer thickness--an in-vitro study].

A Schiffer1, P G Jost-Brinkmann, R R Miethke.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the thickness of the adhesive layer between bracket base and enamel surface on tensile bond strength. Stainless steel brackets with retentive net bases were bonded to bovine incisors with adhesive layers varying in thickness from a minimum of 0.0 mm to a maximum of 0.8 mm. Eight different orthodontic adhesives were investigated; in order to simulate the procedure of indirect bonding, combinations of two different adhesives were also tested. It was found that the highly filled composites provided greatest bond strength. Increasing the thickness of the adhesive layer had no significant influence on tensile bond strength. In the case of light-cured composites, maximum tensile bond strength was achieved at a thickness of the adhesive layer of 0.2 mm. This is probably due to better penetration of light at this thickness. In the case of chemically curing no-mix adhesives, it was impossible to produce effective adhesive layers thicker than 0.2 mm, presumably because curing at the primer paste interface becomes a problem at greater thickness. The influence of cement thickness on tensile bond strength was basically identical whether brackets were bonded with one or two adhesives. Thus, an additional adhesive-adhesive interface has no influence on bond strength. If adhesive layer thickness of more than 0.2 mm are required, a chemically cured, highly filled paste-paste system should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1427541     DOI: 10.1007/bf02325078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  17 in total

1.  PRINCIPLES OF ADHESIVE RETENTION AND ADHESIVE RESTORATIVE MATERIALS.

Authors:  M G BUONOCORE
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  [Method of preparation of an individually programmed bracket system].

Authors:  F Ronay
Journal:  Inf Orthod Kieferorthop       Date:  1990

3.  [Indirect bonding after set-up].

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  Quintessenz       Date:  1990-02

4.  Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil-mesh.

Authors:  D Regan; R van Noort
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Factors affecting in vitro bond strength of no-mix orthodontic cements.

Authors:  L B Evans; J M Powers
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-06

6.  The direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth by means of an epoxy resin adhesive.

Authors:  D H Retief; C J Dreyer; G Gavron
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1970-07

7.  Lingual orthodontics: a status report. Part 3. Indirect bonding - laboratory and clinical procedures.

Authors:  R P Scholz; M L Swartz
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1982-12

8.  Bond strength of three orthodontic adhesives.

Authors:  P Alexandre; J Young; J L Sandrik; D Bowman
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1981-06

9.  Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques.

Authors:  M J Aguirre; G J King; J M Waldron
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-10

10.  Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test.

Authors:  I Nakamichi; M Iwaku; T Fusayama
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.116

View more
  2 in total

1.  In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 2: Bonding to porcelain and composite resin.

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann; S Can; C Drost
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2.

Authors:  Robert Gittner; Ralf Müller-Hartwich; Sylvia Engel; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 1.938

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.