Literature DB >> 1427408

Serum CA125 regression in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with reassessment findings and survival.

R E Buller1, M L Berman, J D Bloss, A Manetta, P J DiSaia.   

Abstract

Findings at reassessment laparotomy and disease-free survival are reported for a group of patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who have had a complete clinical response to cytoreductive surgery and multiagent platinum-based chemotherapy. The predictive value of the number of chemotherapy cycles to achieve a serum CA125 of < 35 U/ml is compared to the predictive value of s, the rate of achieving a normal serum CA125. s is generated from an exponential regression model. This study suggests that s accurately predicts which patients have residual disease at reassessment laparotomy, who will be free of disease, and, of those in the latter group, who are at greatest risk to recur, as well as overall survival. If these observations are confirmed, physicians may base further therapeutic intervention on the basis of a calculated parameter following complete clinical response to first-line treatment rather than relying on findings at reassessment laparotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1427408     DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90082-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

1.  Serum HE4 levels are less frequently elevated than CA125 in women with benign gynecologic disorders.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; Michael Craig Miller; Margaret M Steinhoff; Steven J Skates; Karen H Lu; Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Serum HE4 is more suitable as a biomarker than CA125 in Chinese women with benign gynecologic disorders.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Chunxia Qiao; Lian Li; Xuye Zhao; Yali Li
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Correlates of the preoperative level of CA125 at presentation of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Daniel W Cramer; Allison F Vitonis; William R Welch; Kathryn L Terry; Annekathryn Goodman; Bo R Rueda; Ross S Berkowitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  CA125 immune complexes in ovarian cancer patients with low CA125 concentrations.

Authors:  Daniel W Cramer; Dennis J O'Rourke; Allison F Vitonis; Ursula A Matulonis; Daniel A Dijohnson; Patrick M Sluss; Christopher P Crum; Brian C-S Liu
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study of serum CA-125 levels in patients with stage III optimally debulked ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal compared to intravenous chemotherapy: an analysis of patients enrolled in GOG 172.

Authors:  Thomas C Krivak; Chunqiao Tian; G Scott Rose; Deborah K Armstrong; G Larry Maxwell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Assessment of CA-125 area under the curve as a prognostic factor in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sernaz Uzunoglu; Aysun Aybatlı; Petek Balkanlı Kaplan; Irfan Cicin; Necdet Sut; Cenk Sayın; Fusun Varol
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Identification of Siglec-9 as the receptor for MUC16 on human NK cells, B cells, and monocytes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Belisle; Sachi Horibata; Gubbels A A Jennifer; Sarah Petrie; Arvinder Kapur; Sabine André; Hans-Joachim Gabius; Claudine Rancourt; Joseph Connor; James C Paulson; Manish S Patankar
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 8.  Role of tumour markers in monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  T Meyer; G J Rustin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Altered tumor-cell glycosylation promotes metastasis.

Authors:  Irina Häuselmann; Lubor Borsig
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Polymorphisms of MUC16 (CA125) and MUC1 (CA15.3) in relation to ovarian cancer risk and survival.

Authors:  Kristina A Williams; Kathryn L Terry; Shelley S Tworoger; Allison F Vitonis; Linda J Titus; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.