Literature DB >> 14269568

DISCRIMINATIVE FUNCTIONS BASED ON A DELAY IN THE REINFORCEMENT RELATION.

J H MABRY.   

Abstract

Pigeons were shown to come under discrimination control when the S(D) and S(Delta) were temporally separated from reinforcement and non-reinforcement. S(D) and S(Delta) consisted of distinctive key illuminations presented separately. Responding on an FR 5 in the presence of S(D) or S(Delta) produced a third stimulus containing a schedule requirement. If this third (or interpolated) stimulus was preceded by S(D), responding in its presence produced reinforcement followed by a time-out (TO). If, on the other hand, the third stimulus was preceded by S(Delta), responding produced TO alone. In this fashion, the same stimulus and the same response requirement were imposed between S(D) and the reinforcement as between S(Delta) and the TO. In Experiment I, the schedule employed during the interpolated stimulus was FR; in Experiment II, FI. Discrimination reversal was accomplished in both experiments.

Keywords:  BIRDS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)

Mesh:

Year:  1965        PMID: 14269568      PMCID: PMC1338370          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W W CUMMING; R BERRYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Delayed matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D S BLOUGH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of delay of reinforcement upon an operant discrimination in the pigeon.

Authors:  J L MYERS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-04

5.  Are theories of learning necessary?

Authors:  B F SKINNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A notation system for the description of behavioral procedures.

Authors:  F Mechner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Delayed reinforcement versus reinforcement after a fixed interval.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.