Literature DB >> 1424005

Effects of dynamic cardiomyoplasty on regional wall motion, ejection fraction, and geometry of left ventricle.

E A Bocchi1, L F Moreira, A V de Moraes, G Bellotti, M Gama, N A Stolf, A D Jatene, F Pileggi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty may provide functional and hemodynamic improvement in patients with heart failure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of cardiomyoplasty on global ejection fraction, regional wall motion, and geometry of the left ventricle. METHODS AND
RESULTS: These parameters were determined in 10 patients submitted to cardiomyoplasty for treatment of refractory heart failure by left ventricular (LV) angiography. The studies were performed before and 16.5 +/- 4.8 months after cardiomyoplasty with the myostimulator turned on. They were repeated 24 +/- 1 hours with the myostimulator turned off in eight patients. LV ejection fractions were determined by the area-length method, and the centerline method was used for assessment of regional wall motion. LV geometry was studied by LV major-to-minor axis ratio and sphericity index. A LV ejection fraction improvement from 15 +/- 8% to 30.9 +/- 8.3% (p < 0.01) was demonstrated with the myostimulator turned on after cardiomyoplasty. The values with the myostimulator turned off were 23 +/- 13%, remaining higher than the values observed before surgery (p < 0.05). Regional wall motion analysis showed an improvement in all studied regions. Regarding the LV shape, the left ventricle became markedly more spheric in the diastole.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty may improve LV function in selected patients. The analysis of LV wall motion corroborated these results, and these changes were associated with modifications in the LV geometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1424005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  2 in total

1.  Does left ventricular shape influence clinical outcome in heart failure?

Authors:  K J Harjai; R Edupuganti; E Nunez; T Turgut; L Scott; N G Pandian
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Dynamic cardiomyoplasty as a therapeutic alternative: current status.

Authors:  L F Moreira; N A Stolf
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.214

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.