Literature DB >> 1423864

Repair of mitochondrial DNA after various types of DNA damage in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

S P LeDoux1, G L Wilson, E J Beecham, T Stevnsner, K Wassermann, V A Bohr.   

Abstract

Using methodology recently developed to assess gene-specific DNA repair, we have demonstrated that it is possible not only to study mitochondrial DNA repair, but also directly to compare mitochondrial and nuclear DNA repair in the same biological sample. Complex enzymatic mechanisms recognize and repair nuclear DNA damage, but it has long been thought that there was no DNA repair in mitochondria. Therefore, in an attempt to delineate more clearly which DNA repair mechanisms, if any, are functioning in mitochondria, we have investigated the repair of several specific DNA lesions in mitochondrial DNA. They include cyclobutane dimers, cisplatin intrastrand adducts, cisplatin interstrand crosslinks and alkali-labile sites. We find that pyrimidine dimers and complex alkylation damage are not repaired in mitochondrial DNA, and that there is minimal repair of cisplatin intrastrand crosslinks. In contrast, there is efficient repair of cisplatin interstrand crosslinks as evidenced by approximately 70% of the lesions being removed by 24 h. Additionally, there is efficient repair of N-methylpurines following exposure to methylnitrosourea with approximately 70% of the lesions being removed by 24 h. The results of these studies reveal that repair capacity of mitochondrial DNA damage depends upon the type of lesion produced by the damaging agent. We speculate that a process similar to the base excision mechanism for nuclear DNA exists for mitochondrial DNA but that there is no nucleotide excision repair mechanism to remove more bulky lesions in this organelle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1423864     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/13.11.1967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  75 in total

1.  Disconnecting XRCC1 and DNA ligase III.

Authors:  Sachin Katyal; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Repair of mtDNA in vertebrates.

Authors:  D F Bogenhagen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Repair of persistent strand breaks in the mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Peter Sykora; David M Wilson; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.432

4.  Mitochondrial dysfunction may explain the cardiomyopathy of chronic iron overload.

Authors:  Xueshan Gao; Mingwei Qian; Jian Li Campian; James Marshall; Zhanxiang Zhou; Andrew M Roberts; Y James Kang; Sumanth D Prabhu; Xiao-Feng Sun; John W Eaton
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Mitochondrial DNA ligase is dispensable for the viability of cultured cells but essential for mtDNA maintenance.

Authors:  Inna N Shokolenko; Rafik Z Fayzulin; Sachin Katyal; Peter J McKinnon; Glenn L Wilson; Mikhail F Alexeyev
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Mitochondrial DNA damage and its consequences for mitochondrial gene expression.

Authors:  Susan D Cline
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 7.  Base excision repair and lesion-dependent subpathways for repair of oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  David Svilar; Eva M Goellner; Karen H Almeida; Robert W Sobol
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Altering DNA base excision repair: use of nuclear and mitochondrial-targeted N-methylpurine DNA glycosylase to sensitize astroglia to chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  Jason F Harrison; Mikael L Rinne; Mark R Kelley; Nadiya M Druzhyna; Glenn L Wilson; Susan P Ledoux
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 7.452

Review 9.  Protecting the mitochondrial powerhouse.

Authors:  Morten Scheibye-Knudsen; Evandro F Fang; Deborah L Croteau; David M Wilson; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 20.808

10.  No slave to sex.

Authors:  Isabelle Schön; Koen Martens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.