Literature DB >> 14236914

EFFECTS OF COPROPHAGY PREVENTION ON INTESTINAL MICROFLORA IN RATS.

R J Fitzgerald, B E Gustafsson, E G Mcdaniel.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  APPETITE; DIETARY FATS; EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; FECES; INTESTINAL MICROORGANISMS; LACTOBACILLUS; PARACOLOBACTRUM; RATS; STREPTOCOCCUS FAECALIS

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1964        PMID： 14236914     DOI： 10.1093/jn/84.2.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN： 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Reingestion of feces in rodents and its daily rhythmicity.

Authors:  G J Kenagy; Donald F Hoyt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  [Studies on normal and cecectomized rats].

Authors:  E Kunz
Journal:  Z Ernahrungswiss       Date:  1967-06

Review 3.  The gnotobiotic animal as a tool in the study of host microbial relationships.

Authors:  H A Gordon; L Pesti
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1971-12

4.  Microbial communities exhibit host species distinguishability and phylosymbiosis along the length of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Kevin D Kohl; M Denise Dearing; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Coprophagy prevention alters microbiome, metabolism, neurochemistry, and cognitive behavior in a small mammal.

Authors:  Ting-Bei Bo; Xue-Ying Zhang; Kevin D Kohl; Jing Wen; Shuang-Jie Tian; De-Hua Wang
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Self-reinoculation with fecal flora changes microbiota density and composition leading to an altered bile-acid profile in the mouse small intestine.

Authors:  Said R Bogatyrev; Justin C Rolando; Rustem F Ismagilov
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 14.650
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.