Literature DB >> 1423478

Cellular differences in the regeneration of murine skeletal muscle: a quantitative histological study in SJL/J and BALB/c mice.

C A Mitchell1, J K McGeachie, M D Grounds.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle regeneration in SJL/J and BALB/c mice subjected to identical crush injuries is markedly different: in SJL/J mice myotubes almost completely replace damaged myofibres, whereas BALB/c mice develop fibrotic scar tissue and few myotubes. To determine the cellular changes which contribute to these differential responses to injury, samples of crushed tibialis anterior muscles taken from SJL/J and BALB/c mice between 1 and 10 days after injury were analysed by light and electron microscopy, and by autoradiography. Longitudinal muscle sections revealed about a 2-fold greater total mononuclear cell density in SJL/J than BALB/c mice at 2 to 3 days after injury. Electron micrographs identified a similar proportion of cell types at 3 days after injury. Autoradiographic studies showed that the proportions of replicating mononuclear cells in both strains were similar: therefore greater absolute numbers of cells (including muscle precursors and macrophages) were proliferating in SJL/J muscle. Removal of necrotic muscle debris in SJL/J mice was rapid and extensive, and by 6 to 8 days multinucleated myotubes occupied a large part of the lesion. By contrast, phagocytosis was less effective in BALB/c mice, myotube formation was minimal, and fibrotic tissue conspicuous. These data indicate that the increased mononuclear cell density, more efficient removal of necrotic muscle, together with a greater capacity for myotube formation in SJL/J mice, contribute to the more successful muscle regeneration seen after injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1423478     DOI: 10.1007/bf00384736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Res        ISSN: 0302-766X            Impact factor:   5.249


  24 in total

Review 1.  Towards understanding skeletal muscle regeneration.

Authors:  M D Grounds
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Regeneration of skeletal muscle after grafting in monkeys.

Authors:  J M Markley; J A Faulkner; B M Carlson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Regulation of satellite cells during skeletal muscle growth and development.

Authors:  R E Allen; L L Rankin
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1990-06

4.  Phagocytosis of necrotic muscle in muscle isografts is influenced by the strain, age, and sex of host mice.

Authors:  M D Grounds
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 5.  The regeneration of skeletal muscle. A review.

Authors:  B M Carlson
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1973-06

Review 6.  Secretory products of macrophages.

Authors:  C F Nathan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  The muscle satellite cell: a review.

Authors:  D R Campion
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1984

8.  Migration of myogenic cells in the rat extensor digitorum longus muscle studied with a split autograft model.

Authors:  G D Phillips; J R Hoffman; D R Knighton
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Stimulation of myoblast proliferation in culture by leukaemia inhibitory factor and other cytokines.

Authors:  L Austin; A W Burgess
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Fibroblast growth factors are present in the extracellular matrix produced by endothelial cells in vitro: implications for a role of heparinase-like enzymes in the neovascular response.

Authors:  A Baird; N Ling
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1987-01-30       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  19 in total

1.  Downhill running in rats: influence on neutrophils, macrophages, and MyoD+ cells in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Susan K Tsivitse; Thomas J McLoughlin; Jennifer M Peterson; Eleni Mylona; Stephen J McGregor; Francis X Pizza
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A morphometric technique for the histological quantification of skeletal muscle regeneration.

Authors:  S A Marlow; J K McGeachie; M Tennant; J M Papadimitriou
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The host environment determines strain-specific differences in the timing of skeletal muscle regeneration: cross-transplantation studies between SJL/J and BALB/c mice.

Authors:  P Roberts; J K McGeachie; M D Grounds
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Sca-1 influences the innate immune response during skeletal muscle regeneration.

Authors:  Kimberly K Long; Grace K Pavlath; Monty Montano
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.249

5.  Production of consistent crush lesions of murine skeletal muscle in vivo using an electromechanical device.

Authors:  J L Rushton; I Davies; M A Horan; M Mahon; R Williams
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  The genotype of bone marrow-derived inflammatory cells does not account for differences in skeletal muscle regeneration between SJL/J and BALB/c mice.

Authors:  C A Mitchell; M D Grounds; J M Papadimitriou
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  Development and postnatal regulation of adult myoblasts.

Authors:  Z Yablonka-Reuveni
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Initiation of satellite cell replication in bupivacaine-induced myonecrosis.

Authors:  Y Saito; I Nonaka
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Regeneration of transgenic skeletal muscles with altered timing of expression of the basic helix-loop-helix muscle regulatory factor MRF4.

Authors:  Grace K Pavlath; Janice A Dominov; Kristy M Kegley; Jeffrey Boone Miller
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 10.  The Tubulointerstitial Pathophysiology of Progressive Kidney Disease.

Authors:  H William Schnaper
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.