Literature DB >> 1422329

Cost of urology: financial audit in a clinical department.

P M Cuckow1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To cost a clinical unit over one month in 1991, to cost treatment of individual patients from audit data, and to compare this costing method with the hospital charging system.
DESIGN: A financial breakdown was obtained for one month's work. Ward stay, operating time, investigations, and outpatient visits were costed and a formula (episode = days on ward+hours of operating+investigations+outpatient visits) was used to cost patient episodes from audit data.
SETTING: The adult urology unit in a teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs for each part of patients' treatment.
RESULTS: Total cost was 147,796 pounds for 159 admissions, 738 inpatient days, 131 operations in 29 operating lists, and 615 outpatient visits. An uncomplicated transurethral prostatectomy cost 1140 pounds but complications increased this to 1500 pounds in another patient. The costs of diagnostic cystoscopy were 130 pounds in outpatients, 240 pounds in day surgery, and 430 pounds in inpatients. Hospital charges do not reflect the individual costs of treatment, charges being greater than costs for some patients and lower than costs for others.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can produce a financial analysis of their work and cost their patients' treatment. Audit is strongly advocated as a resource planning tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1422329      PMCID: PMC1883386          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6856.743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  6 in total

1.  What every doctor should know about economics. Part 1. The benefits of costing.

Authors:  J Hall; G Mooney
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Cutting the cost of cataract surgery--a financial audit.

Authors:  J Filer; T J Roberts-Harry; J D Jagger
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Beds or day case unit: your choice?

Authors:  M G Berry; T P Briggs; C Parker; R A Miller
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Use of operating theatres: the effects of case-mix and training in general surgery.

Authors:  L J Opit; R E Collins; G Campbell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Extending the use of clinical audit data: a resource planning model.

Authors:  B W Ellis; R C Rivett; H A Dudley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-21

6.  Responsible use of resources: day surgery.

Authors:  J M Burn
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-02-05
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Resource implications of outpatient referrals to a general urological service.

Authors:  S R Payne; R J Brough; D E Mellor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Minimally invasive surgery. Increases the cost of treatment.

Authors:  P M Cuckow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-29

3.  Is day case surgery in urology associated with high admission rates?

Authors:  J P Crew; K J Turner; J Millar; D W Cranston
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Efficiency in the outpatient department: the lessons from urology.

Authors:  T S O'Brien; J M Perkins; D Cranston
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  An analysis of the costs of alternative treatments for benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Authors:  J A Vale; A S Bdesha; R O Witherow
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 18.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.