Literature DB >> 1420498

Six-year experience with swan neck catheters.

Z J Twardowski1, B F Prowant, W K Nichols, K D Nolph, R Khanna.   

Abstract

From the beginning of our continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) program in January 1977 until June 1985, we used Tenckhoff and Toronto Western Hospital catheters. Throughout these years catheter survival probabilities of about 30% at three years persisted unchanged and were similar to survival probabilities reported by the National CAPD Registry special survey for these catheters. The first improvement in catheter results regarding leaks was noted after the adoption of lateral catheter insertion. Malfunction was less using swan neck prototypes from August 1985 to April 1986. The latter catheters were made of 80 degrees arc angle tubing between 8.5 cm spaced cuffs and were inserted in a reversed U-shape tunnel with the incision at the top of the tunnel. The use of these catheters was abandoned because of high cuff extrusion and exit infection rates. The next generation of swan neck catheters, the swan neck Missouri 2 and 3 catheters with straight intraperitoneal segments, improved the results dramatically. These catheters were made of 180 degrees arc angle tubing between 5 or 3 cm spaced cuffs. The estimated survival probability of 61% at three years more than doubled compared to previously used catheters. Recently we modified the intraperitoneal segment of the catheters, replacing the straight segment with a coiled one. These modified catheters, the swan neck Missouri coiled catheters, have been used exclusively since February 1990. In addition to an acceptable survival probability of 88% at one year, there are two major advantages of these catheters, the same as for other coiled catheters: elimination of infusion pain due to a jet effect and pain related to straight catheter tip pressure on the peritoneum experienced by some patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1420498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  5 in total

Review 1.  Peritoneal catheters and related infections.

Authors:  Elias Thodis; Ploumis Passadakis; Nikolaos Lyrantzopooulos; Stelios Panagoutsos; Vassilis Vargemezis; Dimitrios Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  New peritoneal catheters: new catheter problems?

Authors:  Mercedes Moreiras-Plaza; Isabel Maria Martin-Baez; Raquel Blanco-García; Laura Vanessa Beato-Coo; Cynthia Raquel Cossio-Aranibar
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Unintentional Removal of a Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter: A Case Report.

Authors:  H Nakamura; M Anayama; Y Makino; K Tamura; M Nagasawa
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Conservative surgical management of catheter infections in children on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Francesco Macchini; Sara Testa; Alberto Valadè; Maurizio Torricelli; Ernesto Leva; Gianluigi Ardissino; Alberto Edefonti
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Coiled catheter for recurrent migration.

Authors:  Gudithi Swarnalatha; Rapur Ram; B Pai Santosh; Vasa Ramesh; Koligotla V Dakshinamurty
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2011-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.