Literature DB >> 1417430

Course of depressive symptoms over follow-up. Findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program.

M T Shea1, I Elkin, S D Imber, S M Sotsky, J T Watkins, J F Collins, P A Pilkonis, E Beckham, D R Glass, R T Dolan.   

Abstract

We studied the course of depressive symptoms during an 18-month naturalistic follow-up period for outpatients with Major Depressive Disorder treated in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. The treatment phase consisted of 16 weeks of randomly assigned treatment with the following: cognitive behavior therapy, interpersonal therapy, imipramine hydrochloride plus clinical management (CM), or placebo plus CM. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. Of all patients entering treatment and having follow-up data, the percent who recovered (8 weeks of minimal or no symptoms following the end of treatment) and remained well during follow-up (no Major Depressive Disorder relapse) did not differ significantly among the four treatments: 30% (14/46) for those in the cognitive behavior therapy group, 26% (14/53) for those in the interpersonal therapy group, 19% (9/48) for those in the imipramine plus CM group, and 20% (10/51) for those in the placebo plus CM group. Among patients who had recovered, rates of Major Depressive Disorder relapse were 36% (8/22) for those in the cognitive behavior therapy group, 33% (7/21) for those in the interpersonal therapy group, 50% (9/18) for those in the imipramine plus CM group, and 33% (5/15) for those in the placebo plus CM group. The major finding of this study is that 16 weeks of these specific forms of treatment is insufficient for most patients to achieve full recovery and lasting remission. Future research should be directed at improving success rates of initial and maintenance treatments for depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1417430     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100026006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  46 in total

Review 1.  Should general practitioners refer patients with major depression to counsellors? A review of current published evidence. Nottingham Counselling and Antidepressants in Primary Care (CAPC) Study Group.

Authors:  R Churchill; M Dewey; V Gretton; C Duggan; C Chilvers; A Lee
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Assessment of subclinical symptoms and psychological well-being in depression.

Authors:  G A Fava; L Mangelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  Treatment of recurrent depression: an alternate viewpoint.

Authors:  Michael E Thase
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Improving cognitive therapy for depression with functional analytic psychotherapy: Theory and case study.

Authors:  R J Kohlenberg; M Tsai
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1994

5.  Pilot study of treatment for major depression among women prisoners with substance use disorder.

Authors:  Jennifer E Johnson; Caron Zlotnick
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  The added costs of depression to medical care.

Authors:  K Franco; M Tamburino; N Campbell; J Zrull; C Evans; D Bronson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  The efficacy and acceptability of psychological interventions for depression: where we are now and where we are going.

Authors:  Steven D Hollon
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 6.892

8.  Modeling the complexity of post-treatment drinking: it's a rocky road to relapse.

Authors:  Katie Witkiewitz; G Alan Marlatt
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01-18

Review 9.  Acupuncture for Treating Anxiety and Depression in Women: A Clinical Systematic Review.

Authors:  David P Sniezek; Imran J Siddiqui
Journal:  Med Acupunct       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Quality of mental health service care: the forgotten pathway from process to outcome.

Authors:  T S Brugha; F Lindsay
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.