Literature DB >> 14168288

SOME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REAL AND APPARENT VISUAL MOVEMENT.

P A KOLERS.   

Abstract

Keywords:  MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL PERCEPTION

Mesh：

Year:  1963        PMID： 14168288     DOI： 10.1016/0042-6989(63)90053-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN： 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: a window technique for estimating path curvature.

Authors:  M K McBeath; R N Shepard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-10

2.  A motion aftereffect for long-range stroboscopic apparent motion.

Authors:  M W von Grünau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-07

3.  The involvement of illusory contours in stroboscopic motion.

Authors:  M W von Grünau
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-03

4.  The complementarity of apparent and real motion.

Authors:  L Kaufman; I Cyrulnik; J Kaplowitz; G Melnick; D Stoff
Journal:  Psychol Forsch       Date:  1971

5.  Transfer of predictive signals across saccades.

Authors:  Petra Vetter; Grace Edwards; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-08

6.  Predictive feedback to V1 dynamically updates with sensory input.

Authors:  Grace Edwards; Petra Vetter; Fiona McGruer; Lucy S Petro; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Apparent motion can impair and enhance target visibility: the role of shape in predicting and postdicting object continuity.

Authors:  Peter J Lenkic; James T Enns
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.