Literature DB >> 1416561

Detection of renovascular hypertension. State of the art: 1992.

S J Mann1, T G Pickering.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review recent advances in detecting renovascular hypertension. DATA SOURCES: Original English-language reports obtained through a MEDLINE search for the years 1987 to 1991. Also, a manual search through Index Medicus as well as bibliographies of original reports and selected review articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Cited studies were critically reviewed with emphasis on study size, patient sample, methods, diagnostic criteria, and reproducibility of results. Where applicable, reviews that combined the results of smaller studies are cited.
RESULTS: A sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 89% have been reported for the captopril test and of 93% and 95%, respectively, for captopril scintigraphy with diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA). The sensitivity and specificity of renal vein renin determination are 80% and 62%, respectively and may increase with the use of stricter technical criteria and maneuvers to stimulate renin secretion. These tests differentiate renovascular hypertension from essential hypertension more reliably than from asymmetric renal parenchymal disease; however, they do not reliably distinguish unilateral from bilateral stenosis. Other tests are less widely used. Intravenous pyelography (sensitivity, 74.5%; specificity, 86.2%) has the disadvantages of radiation and dye load exposure. Intravenous angiography is expensive and invasive and does not always enable visualization of the origin of the renal artery. The roles of duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography remain to be clarified.
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive tests are cost effective and have a high predictive value in patients with clinical clues suggestive of renovascular hypertension. These tests are not recommended for use in patients with a low likelihood of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1416561     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-10-845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  20 in total

Review 1.  An evidence-based approach to diagnosing renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  M J Bloch
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  What does acute dyspnea hide?

Authors:  Giovanna Squiccimarro; Maria Carrabba; Cinzia Hu; Maria Domenica Cappellini; Giovanna Fabio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Can patients with significant renal artery stenosis who underwent renal angioplasty be monitored postprocedure in the general ward instead of the high dependency unit?

Authors:  Ashish Sule; Dessmon Yh Tai; Tay Jam Chin; Pankaj Handa
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

4.  Outcome of blood pressure and renal function in patients with renal artery stenosis after stenting.

Authors:  Ashish Anil Sule; Dessmon Yh Tai; Siew Pang Chan; Pankaj Handa; Jam C Tay
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2007

Review 5.  An update on renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  Martin Senitko; Andrew Z Fenves
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  New diagnostic tests combining drugs and nuclear medicine.

Authors:  R W Myers
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-10

7.  Captopril renography for the detection of renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  I R McDougall; K R Nielsen
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-05

8.  Hemodynamic analysis of renal artery stenosis using computational fluid dynamics technology based on unenhanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary results.

Authors:  Weisheng Zhang; Yi Qian; Jiang Lin; Peng Lv; Kaavya Karunanithi; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Drug therapy of renovascular hypertension.

Authors:  Talma Rosenthal
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.

Authors:  F Stacul; S Gava; M Belgrano; S Cernic; L Pagnan; F Pozzi Mucelli; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.