Literature DB >> 1416235

Estimated and true hinge axis: a comparison of condylar displacements.

D P Wood1, P H Korne.   

Abstract

The purposes of the investigation were: i) to compare the condylar displacements from centric slides for 74 sets of casts mounted with an estimated versus a true hinge axis; ii) to determine the error in hinge axes location on the recording of condylar displacements from centric slides; and iii) to define the reproducibility of the Mandibular Position Indicator (MPI), a method of measuring condylar (in vitro) displacements from centric relation position. The findings revealed that routine use of the true hinge axis to obtain MPI readings for analysis of diagnostic casts is not warranted. The mean standard error of MPI double readings attributed to both hinge axes location was 0.4 mm for each component in the sagittal plane. Of the 0.4 mm of mean standard error, 0.2 mm was contributed by the lack of reproducibility of the MPI. The centric relation bite registration technique outlined in this study always captured a superior articulator position of the condylar mechanism. The condylar distractions and deflections from centric relation to maximum intercuspation were primarily in an inferior direction with a smaller posterior component.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1416235     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1992)062<0167:EATHAA>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

1.  Condylar displacement between centric relation and maximum intercuspation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Soo Young Kim Weffort; Solange Mongelli de Fantini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Effects of CO-CR discrepancy in daily orthodontic treatment planning.

Authors:  Carmen Maria Costea; Mîndra Eugenia Badea; Sorin Vasilache; Michaela Mesaroş
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2016-04-15

3.  Articulated dental cast analysis of asymptomatic and symptomatic populations.

Authors:  Frank E Cordray
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.344

4.  The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation.

Authors:  Ilona Radej; Izabela Szarmach
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The University Münster model surgery system for orthognathic surgery - The digital update.

Authors:  Thomas Stamm; Dennis Böttcher; Johannes Kleinheinz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.151

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.