Literature DB >> 1415377

Subjective quality of life assessment in hemodialysis patients at different levels of hemoglobin following use of recombinant human erythropoietin.

L P McMahon1, J K Dawborn.   

Abstract

The quality of life of 12 hemodialysis (HD) patients was assessed in a prospective, blinded, cross-over fashion before treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) and at two different levels of hemoglobin (Hb, 9 and 12 g/dl) by means of an interviewer-based questionnaire, the sickness impact profile (SIP). Patients were matched into two groups with no significant difference for age, weight, Hb (6.3 +/- 0.5, mean +/- SEM, group A, vs. 6.4 +/- 0.9 group B), length of hemodialysis or number of years of prior transplantation. SIP was assessed prior to treatment, after reaching the first target Hb (Hb 9 g/dl group A, 12 g/dl group B), after 4 months at that target Hb and after 4 months at the alternative target Hb for each group. For all patients, there was a highly significant improvement in quality of life as assessed by lower SIP scores between the initial and second assessments. This was evident for the physical (8.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 2.8 +/- 1.0; p less than 0.001) and psychosocial (14.9 +/- 3.9 vs. 4.4 +/- 1.1; p less than 0.01) dimensions. Total scores (16.3 +/- 2.4 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.9; p less than 0.001) showed similar changes, reflecting significant improvement in 10 of 12 possible categories between the first two assessments (p less than 0.05 to p less than 0.001). Improved scores were maintained but did not change appreciably after the 2nd assessment. There was no significant difference in any score (category, dimensional or total) obtained after 4 months at Hb 9 g/dl compared to those after the same period at Hb 12 g/dl.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1415377     DOI: 10.1159/000168439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  5 in total

1.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness.

Authors:  H Beckerman; M E Roebroeck; G J Lankhorst; J G Becher; P D Bezemer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Low-dosage epoetin in maintenance haemodialysis: costs and quality-of-life improvement.

Authors:  D C Harris
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  A review of quality of life in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  D S Parsons; D C Harris
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Anemia and cardiovascular disease, hospitalization, end stage renal disease, and death in older patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Shuling Li; Robert N Foley; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  New trends on health related quality of life assessment in end-stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  Pablo Rebollo; Francisco Ortega
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.