Literature DB >> 1414835

Artifacts associated with MR neuroangiography.

J Tsuruda1, D Saloner, D Norman.   

Abstract

Neurovascular MR angiography (MRA) is rapidly gaining greater clinical acceptance. To provide functional information, novel techniques of acquisition, information processing, and display are used, generating a new set of artifacts. The purpose of this paper is to outline the causes, provide examples, and note clinical problems associated with MRA artifacts by grouping them into six common types: 1) poor visualization of small vessels, 2) overestimation of stenosis, 3) view-to-view variations, 4) false positives, 5) false negatives, and 6) vessel overlap. This in turn will lead to four generalized solutions: 1) optimize acquisition parameters, 2) edit volume boundaries before performing maximum intensity projection reconstructions, 3) refer to the individual source images, and 4) use alternative image processing. By organizing and simplifying both clinical problems and solutions into major categories, a greater understanding of the current clinical indications and the overall goals of MRA can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1414835      PMCID: PMC8335209     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  L Liang; Y Korogi; T Sugahara; M Onomichi; Y Shigematsu; D Yang; M Kitajima; Y Hiai; M Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  A novel algorithm for refining cerebral vascular measurements in infants and adults.

Authors:  Li Chen; Stephen R Dager; Dennis W W Shaw; Neva M Corrigan; Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Kristi D Pimentel; Natalia M Kleinhans; Patricia K Kuhl; Jenq-Neng Hwang; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  MR angiography in pediatric neurological disorders.

Authors:  B C Lee; T S Park; B A Kaufman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

4.  Magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  C J Bakker
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1994-01

5.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms.

Authors:  H R Jäger; H Ellamushi; E A Moore; J P Grieve; N D Kitchen; W J Taylor
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Can 3T MR angiography replace DSA for the identification of arteries feeding intracranial meningiomas?

Authors:  H Uetani; M Akter; T Hirai; Y Shigematsu; M Kitajima; Y Kai; S Yano; H Nakamura; K Makino; M Azuma; R Murakami; Y Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  New technique: the use of the THRIVE sequence in the follow-up of patients who received endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment.

Authors:  Emre Mırçık; Bahattin Hakyemez
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Carotid magnetic resonance angiography: improved image quality with dual 3-inch surface coils.

Authors:  S H Faro; S Vinitski; H V Ortega; F B Mohamed; C Y Chen; A E Flanders; C F Gonzales; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Magnetic resonance angiography and selective angiography following extra-intracranial bypass operations.

Authors:  S Trattnig; C Matula; G Gomiscek; J Kramer; H Görzer; E Schindler; H Imhof
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Jugular Venous Reflux Can Mimic Posterior Fossa Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas on MRI-MRA.

Authors:  M Travis Caton; Andrew L Callen; Alexander Z Copelan; Kazim H Narsinh; Eric R Smith; Matthew R Amans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.