Literature DB >> 1414393

Should be biologic marker be sensitive and specific?

J I Nurnberger1.   

Abstract

Potential biologic markers in psychiatry are often subjected to tests of sensitivity and specificity. However, in many instances, clinically diagnosed diseases may not be truly singular in their pathophysiology, and these tests may be inappropriate. One may distinguish between diagnostic markers useful in clinical pathology, linkage markers specifying genetic location and pathophysiologic markers that are primarily valuable as research tools. The latter are probably most useful in present-day psychiatry but they may not be sensitive or specific in their correspondence to clinical diagnosis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1414393     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  4 in total

1.  Macroscopic fast neuronal oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Odin van der Stelt; Aysenil Belger; Jeffrey A Lieberman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Tracking biocultural pathways in population health: the value of biomarkers.

Authors:  Carol M Worthman; E Jane Costello
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  Magnetoencephalography study of right parietal lobe dysfunction of the evoked mirror neuron system in antipsychotic-free schizophrenia.

Authors:  Yutaka Kato; Taro Muramatsu; Motoichiro Kato; Yoshiyuki Shibukawa; Masuro Shintani; Masaru Mimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Application of electroencephalography to the study of cognitive and brain functions in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Odin van der Stelt; Aysenil Belger
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 9.306

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.