Literature DB >> 1412757

The quality of life in renal transplantation--a prospective study.

J D Russell1, M L Beecroft, D Ludwin, D N Churchill.   

Abstract

Methodologically sound measures of quality of life are required to judge accurately the impact of successful renal transplantation on patient well-being. The time trade-off (TTO) method is a reproducible and valid measure which we used to prospectively assess changes in the quality of life of 27 patients on maintenance dialysis who subsequently underwent renal transplantation. TTO scores approaching 0 signify a very poor quality of life, while scores approaching 1 represent perfect health. Of 98 dialysis patients who completed baseline TTO interviews, 31 consecutive patients subsequently received 28 cadaveric and 3 living related kidney transplants. Four of 31 patients did not complete a second TTO assessment, because of death in 2 patients and graft loss in 2 others. The remaining 27 patients completed a second TTO interview an average of 30.9 months following transplantation (range 1.5-52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.4-37.5) and formed the study cohort. At the time of study the mean serum creatinine for the cohort was 173 mumol/L (range 90-290, 95% CI 152-195 mumol/L). The employment rate rose 27% following transplantation (P = 0.10); but when males alone were analyzed, a significant increase of 38% (P = 0.048) was noted. During the dialysis period, the mean baseline TTO score was 0.41 (95% CI 0.33-0.49), confirming the observations of others. Following transplantation, the mean TTO score rose to 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81), a difference that is statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean increase in TTO score observed as a result of successful transplantation was 0.33 (95% CI 0.26-0.40). This magnitude of improvement was found in 20 of 27 patients (74%), whose TTO scores lay within or above the 95% CI (0.26-0.40) for the mean change in score of 0.33. One patient's score fell, while the remaining 6 patients had improvements in their TTO score which fell below the lower 95% CI value (0.26) for the mean change in score. We conclude that the 95% CI of 0.26-0.40 identifies a range in which clinically important improvements in quality of life will be found for the majority of patients receiving successful kidney transplants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1412757     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199210000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  26 in total

1.  The SF36 as an outcome measure of services for end stage renal failure.

Authors:  J P Wight; L Edwards; J Brazier; S Walters; J N Payne; C B Brown
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

Review 2.  Canadian Society of Transplantation: consensus guidelines on eligibility for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Greg Knoll; Sandra Cockfield; Tom Blydt-Hansen; Dana Baran; Bryce Kiberd; David Landsberg; David Rush; Edward Cole
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Social participation and employment status after kidney transplantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sijrike F van der Mei; Boudien Krol; Willem J van Son; Paul E de Jong; Johan W Groothoff; Wim J A van den Heuvel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Daratumumab in Sensitized Kidney Transplantation: Potentials and Limitations of Experimental and Clinical Use.

Authors:  Jean Kwun; Marie Matignon; Miriam Manook; Soulef Guendouz; Vincent Audard; David Kheav; Elsa Poullot; Chantal Gautreau; Brian Ezekian; Diane Bodez; Thibault Damy; Laureline Faivre; Dehbia Menouch; Janghoon Yoon; Jaeberm Park; Karim Belhadj; Dongfeng Chen; Alyssa M Bilewski; John S Yi; Bradley Collins; Mark Stegall; Alton B Farris; Stuart Knechtle; Philippe Grimbert
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Computed tomography identified factors that preclude living kidney donation.

Authors:  Katerina Mastrocostas; Christina M Chingkoe; Kenneth T Pace; Joseph J Barfett; Anish Kirpalani; Gevork N Mnatzakanian; Paraskevi A Vlachou; Errol Colak
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  A review of quality of life in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  D S Parsons; D C Harris
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Paired exchange kidney donation in India: a five-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Mrinal Pahwa; Yusuf Saifee; Vipin Tyagi; Sudhir Chadha; Harsh Jauhari
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Trends in mortality and graft failure for renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Douglas E Schaubel; John R Jeffery; Yang Mao; Robert Semenciw; Karen Yeates; Stanley S A Fenton
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Biomarkers in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  John Choi; Albana Bano; Jamil Azzi
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 10.  New trends on health related quality of life assessment in end-stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  Pablo Rebollo; Francisco Ortega
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.