Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment.

This research was undertaken to determine whether or not disabled persons are at a disadvantage when seeking employment. An experimental design--mailing unsolicited job applications to employers--in a natural social setting allowed a study of employer's behaviour under naturalistic conditions. A randomized comparative study was conducted on a representative sample of 2228 branches of French companies, stratified as a function of their size. Four different profiles of applications were constituted by crossing two independent variables: the presence or absence of mention of a physical deficiency (paraplegia, with a wheelchair) in the job application, and high or low level of qualification. Using random sampling, the investigators sent each company an application for a job using one of these four profiles. Two experimental groups of companies were constituted (each of which received an application with either high or low qualification and mention of disability) with two control groups (applications with high/low qualification, without mention of disability). It was found that highly qualified able-bodied applicants were 1.78 times more likely to receive a favorable response than their disabled counterparts, and modestly qualified able-bodied applicants were 3.2 times more likely to receive a positive response. As well, discrimination became more marked as company size increased. In comparison with laboratory experiments, the results of this research permit a more objective assessment of discriminatory behaviour by companies confronted by disabled job applicants, and show a significant amount of discrimination towards individuals with a physical disability.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes