Literature DB >> 1411693

His and hers: male and female anatomy in anatomy texts for U.S. medical students, 1890-1989.

S C Lawrence1, K Bendixen.   

Abstract

Much recent work on gender has emphasized how ideas of male and female differences underlie cultural assumptions about appropriate social relations, behavior, institutions and knowledge. This study focuses on the specific ways that anatomy texts for medical students in the United States have presented male and female anatomy between 1890 and 1989, using both numerical data and analysis of textual examples from 31 texts. Despite public debates about gender representation, anatomy texts have generally remained consistent in how 'the' human body has been depicted in this century. In illustrations, vocabulary and syntax, these texts primarily depict male anatomy as the norm or standard against which female structures are compared. Modern texts thus continue long-standing historical conventions in which male anatomy provides the basic model for 'the' human body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1411693     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90107-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Sexism and anatomy, as discerned in textbooks and as perceived by medical students at Cardiff University and University of Paris Descartes.

Authors:  Susan Morgan; Odile Plaisant; Baptiste Lignier; Bernard J Moxham
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Do students' attitudes toward women change during medical school?

Authors:  S P Phillips; K E Ferguson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-02-09       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The social context of women's health: goals and objectives for medical education.

Authors:  S Phillips
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Defining and measuring gender: a social determinant of health whose time has come.

Authors:  Susan P Phillips
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2005-07-13

5.  Textbook typologies: Challenging the myth of the perfect obstetric pelvis.

Authors:  Caroline VanSickle; Kylea L Liese; Julienne N Rutherford
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.227

6.  The Core Concepts, Competencies, and Grand Challenges of Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy and Morphology.

Authors:  Nicole Danos; Katie Lynn Staab; Lisa B Whitenack
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-07-30

7.  New context, new content-Rethinking genital anatomy in textbooks.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hayes; Meredith J Temple-Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.