Literature DB >> 1410707

Biological markers of environmental and ecological contamination: an overview.

L R Shugart1, J F McCarthy, R S Halbrook.   

Abstract

An approach, using biomarkers (biological responses) for assessing the biological and ecological significance of contaminants present in the environment is described. Living organisms integrate exposure to contaminants in their environment and respond in some measurable and predictable way. Responses are observed at several levels of biological organization from the biomolecular level, where pollutants can cause damage to critical cellular macromolecules and elicit defensive strategies such as detoxication and repair mechanisms, to the organismal level, where severe disturbances are manifested as impairment in growth, reproduction, developmental abnormalities, or decreased survival. Biomarkers can provide not only evidence of exposure to a broad spectrum of anthropogenic chemicals, but also a temporally integrated measure of bioavailable contaminant levels. A suite of biomarkers are evaluated over time to determine the magnitude of the problem and possible consequences. Relationships between biomarker response and adverse ecological effects are determined from estimates of animal health and population structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1410707     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00687.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  8 in total

1.  Impact of environmental inequity on health outcome: where is the epidemiological evidence?

Authors:  A A René; D E Daniels; S A Martin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  Efficiency of biomonitoring methods applying tropical bioindicator plants for assessing the phytoxicity of the air pollutants in SE, Brazil.

Authors:  Ricardo Keiichi Nakazato; Marisia Pannia Esposito; Poliana Cardoso-Gustavson; Patrícia Bulbovas; Andrea Nunes Vaz Pedroso; Pedro Ivo Lembo Silveira de Assis; Marisa Domingos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Promoter complexity and tissue-specific expression of stress response components in Mytilus galloprovincialis, a sessile marine invertebrate species.

Authors:  Chrysa Pantzartzi; Elena Drosopoulou; Minas Yiangou; Ignat Drozdov; Sophia Tsoka; Christos A Ouzounis; Zacharias G Scouras
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Utility of chromosomal position of heterochromatin as a biomarker of radiation-induced genetic damage: a study of Chornobyl voles (Microtus sp.).

Authors:  Lara E Wiggins; Ronald A Van Den Bussche; Meredith J Hamilton; Ronald K Chesser; Robert J Baker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 5.  Somatic and heritable effects of environmental genotoxins and the emergence of evolutionary toxicology.

Authors:  J W Bickham; M J Smolen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Environmental genotoxicity: probing the underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  L Shugart; C Theodorakis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Health of white sucker within the St. Louis River area of concern associated with habitat usage as assessed using stable isotopes.

Authors:  V S Blazer; J Hoffman; H L Walsh; R P Braham; C Hahn; P Collins; Z Jorgenson; T Ledder
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Effects of freshwater pollution on the genetics of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) at the molecular and population level.

Authors:  Emilia G Thomas; Maja Srut; Anamaria Stambuk; Göran I V Klobučar; Alfred Seitz; Eva Maria Griebeler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.