Literature DB >> 1410360

Esophageal motor disorders: videofluoroscopic and manometric evaluation--prospective study in 88 symptomatic patients.

W Schima1, G Stacher, P Pokieser, K Uranitsch, D Nekahm, E Schober, G Moser, D Tscholakoff.   

Abstract

Esophageal motor disorders are best evaluated with manometry, which, however, is time-consuming and not generally available. The authors prospectively investigated the yield of videofluoroscopy in detection of esophageal motor disorders in comparison with that of manometry. Eighty-eight patients with dysphagia, globus sensation, noncardiac chest pain, or progressive systemic sclerosis underwent both manometry and videofluoroscopy at 0-32-day intervals. Videofluoroscopy was performed with one swallowing study in the upright position and up to three swallowing studies in the prone oblique position. Manometric diagnoses of achalasia (n = 15), diffuse esophageal spasm (n = 1), nonspecific esophageal motor disorders (n = 44), and adynamic esophagus (n = 9) were made. Videofluoroscopically, 87% of the patients with achalasia, the one patient with diffuse spasms, 73% of the patients with nonspecific esophageal motor disorders, and all of the patients with adynamic esophagus received a correct diagnosis, for an overall sensitivity of 80%. The radiographic specificity was 79%. The authors conclude that videofluoroscopy is a valuable and reasonably sensitive technique for screening for esophageal motor disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1410360     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy: a modern technique and review of outcomes.

Authors:  Cheguevara Afaneh; Brendan Finnerty; Jonathan S Abelson; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-03-21

2.  Initial experience with magnetic resonance fluoroscopy in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders. Comparison with manometry and barium fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Fortunee Irene Habib; Ernesto Tomei; Pasquale Paolantonio; Michele Anzidei; Andrea Laghi; Carlo Catalano; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Utility of Esophagram versus High-Resolution Manometry in the Detection of Esophageal Dysmotility.

Authors:  Ashli K O'Rourke; Andreea Lazar; Benjamin Murphy; Donald O Castell; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Role of Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Noparat Prachasitthisak; Michael Purcell; Usha Krishnan
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 5.  [Treatment of achalasia].

Authors:  Enrico P Cosentini; Etienne Wenzl; Raimund Jakesz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-05-31       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Optimal evaluation of patients with nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia. Manometry, scintigraphy, or videoesophagography?

Authors:  H P Parkman; A H Maurer; D F Caroline; D L Miller; B Krevsky; R S Fisher
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Videofluoroscopy of the pharynx and esophagus in chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  W Schima; P Pokieser; C Forstinger; K Uranitsch; P Kalhs; E Schober; P Kier; D Tscholakoff
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 May-Jun

8.  Onigiri esophagography as a screening test for esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Shohei Hamada; Eikichi Ihara; Kazumasa Muta; Masafumi Wada; Yoshitaka Hata; Hiroko Ikeda; Yoshimasa Tanaka; Haruei Ogino; Takatoshi Chinen; Yoshihiro Ogawa
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.