Literature DB >> 1410342

Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique--comparison with pulmonary angiography.

M Remy-Jardin1, J Remy, L Wattinne, F Giraud.   

Abstract

Forty-two patients were prospectively evaluated with spiral volumetric computed tomography (CT) and selective pulmonary angiography of each lung to detect central pulmonary thromboembolism. Spiral volumetric CT images obtained with either 90 mL of 30% contrast material or 120 mL of 12% contrast material were graded as excellent or good in 98% of the examinations (41 patients). Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral volumetric CT was based on the direct visualization of intraluminal clots: partial filling defects (n = 41; 37%), complete filling defects (n = 51; 46%), "railway track" signs (n = 6; 5%), and mural defects (n = 14; 12%). All 23 patients with normal findings of spiral volumetric CT had normal findings of pulmonary angiography. With spiral volumetric CT, the finding of 112 central emboli (eight main, 28 lobar, and 76 segmental) corresponded exactly to the angiographic findings, but nine intersegmental lymph nodes were erroneously interpreted as filling defects. In one case of normal pulmonary angiographic findings, asymmetry in pulmonary arterial perfusion was misinterpreted as pulmonary embolism with spiral volumetric CT. Spiral volumetric CT can reliably depict thromboemboli in second- to fourth-division pulmonary vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1410342     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  75 in total

Review 1.  Spiral computed tomographic scanning and magnetic resonance angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  P A Grenier; C Beigelman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  The non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolus.

Authors:  A K Dixon; R A Coulden; A M Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

3.  Comparison of doses for pulmonary embolism detection with helical CT and pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  Arnaud Resten; Franck Mausoleo; M Valero; Dominique Musset
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Pulmonary embolism: is multislice CT the method of choice? For.

Authors:  Ieneke J C Hartmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prognostic significance of multidetector computed tomography in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism: rationale, methodology and reproducibility for the PROTECT study.

Authors:  David Jiménez; José Luis Lobo; Manuel Monreal; Remedios Otero; Roger D Yusen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  CTPA as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rosa M Estrada-Y-Martin; Sandra A Oldham
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: time to rewrite the textbooks.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Reproducibility of multi-detector spiral computed tomography in detection of sub-segmental acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  S Brunot; O Corneloup; V Latrabe; M Montaudon; F Laurent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Roy; Isabelle Colombet; Pierre Durieux; Gilles Chatellier; Hervé Sors; Guy Meyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-30

10.  Role of spiral volumetric computed tomographic scanning in the assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal ventilation/perfusion lung scan.

Authors:  A B van Rossum; F E Treurniet; G J Kieft; S J Smith; R Schepers-Bok
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.