Literature DB >> 1409565

Fast structure alignment for protein databank searching.

C A Orengo1, N P Brown, W R Taylor.   

Abstract

A fast method is described for searching and analyzing the protein structure databank. It uses secondary structure followed by residue matching to compare protein structures and is developed from a previous structural alignment method based on dynamic programming. Linear representations of secondary structures are derived and their features compared to identify equivalent elements in two proteins. The secondary structure alignment then constrains the residue alignment, which compares only residues within aligned secondary structures and with similar buried areas and torsional angles. The initial secondary structure alignment improves accuracy and provides a means of filtering out unrelated proteins before the slower residue alignment stage. It is possible to search or sort the protein structure databank very quickly using just secondary structure comparisons. A search through 720 structures with a probe protein of 10 secondary structures required 1.7 CPU hours on a Sun 4/280. Alternatively, combined secondary structure and residue alignments, with a cutoff on the secondary structure score to remove pairs of unrelated proteins from further analysis, took 10.1 CPU hours. The method was applied in searches on different classes of proteins and to cluster a subset of the databank into structurally related groups. Relationships were consistent with known families of protein structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1409565     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340140203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of PSI-BLAST alignment accuracy in comparison to structural alignments.

Authors:  I Friedberg; T Kaplan; H Margalit
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A rapid classification protocol for the CATH Domain Database to support structural genomics.

Authors:  F M Pearl; N Martin; J E Bray; D W Buchan; A P Harrison; D Lee; G A Reeves; A J Shepherd; I Sillitoe; A E Todd; J M Thornton; C A Orengo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  CORA--topological fingerprints for protein structural families.

Authors:  C A Orengo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Classification of protein folds.

Authors:  Robert B Russell
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Classification of protein disulphide-bridge topologies.

Authors:  J M Mas; P Aloy; M A Martí-Renom; B Oliva; R de Llorens; F X Avilés; E Querol
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  MATRAS: A program for protein 3D structure comparison.

Authors:  Takeshi Kawabata
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Modelling of peptide and protein structures.

Authors:  S Fraga; J M Parker
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 8.  Knowledge-based model building of proteins: concepts and examples.

Authors:  J Bajorath; R Stenkamp; A Aruffo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Determinants of strand register in antiparallel beta-sheets of proteins.

Authors:  E G Hutchinson; R B Sessions; J M Thornton; D N Woolfson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  An optimized TOPS+ comparison method for enhanced TOPS models.

Authors:  Mallika Veeramalai; David Gilbert; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.