Literature DB >> 1409127

Immune responses to osteochondral allografts: nature and significance.

G E Friedlaender1, M C Horowitz.   

Abstract

Osteochondral allografts evoke immune responses. The nature of these immune responses and their biologic significance are still only partially understood. It is clear, however, that cell surface antigens of the major histocompatibility complex represented on the cellular elements of bone grafts cause T-cell activation, specifically those of the suppressor/cytotoxic phenotype. In numerous animal models, the most immunogenic bone allografts (mismatched, fresh) have demonstrated the poorest clinical and biologic outcomes, while more closely matched and/or grafts treated to reduce immunogenicity (frozen, freeze-dried) have more successfully incorporated. These observations support the hypothesis that immune responses against bone-graft related antigens have biologic significance and that reducing these responses may improve clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1409127     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19921001-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  12 in total

1.  Current status of cartilage grafting.

Authors:  W H Akeson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-02

Review 2.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in the extremities.

Authors:  Georgios I Drosos; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Konstantinos Kazakos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

3.  Use of freeze-dried bone allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maurice Caltran; Claude Savornin; Patrick Le Couteur; Paul Jouan; Philippe Deroche; Jean-François Vinceneux; Laurence Barnouin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2002-12-17

4.  Effectiveness of Lavage Techniques in Removing Immunogenic Elements from Osteochondral Allografts.

Authors:  Maximilian A Meyer; Mark A McCarthy; Matthew E Gitelis; Sarah G Poland; Atsushi Urita; Susan Chubinskaya; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  Clinical cartilage restoration: evolution and overview.

Authors:  Jack Farr; Brian Cole; Aman Dhawan; James Kercher; Seth Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in spinal fusion.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Sotirios Christodoulou; Konstantinos Kazakos; Georgios I Drosos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

7.  Osteochondral Allografts in the Ankle Joint: State of the Art.

Authors:  Francesca Vannini; Roberto Buda; Gherardo Pagliazzi; Alberto Ruffilli; Marco Cavallo; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Tissue engineering of cartilage: the road a group of researchers have traveled.

Authors:  Hwa-Chang Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Autologous bone graft versus demineralized bone matrix in internal fixation of ununited long bones.

Authors:  Oliver Pieske; Alexandra Wittmann; Johannes Zaspel; Thomas Löffler; Bianka Rubenbauer; Heiko Trentzsch; Stefan Piltz
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-15

10.  Biologic response to carbonated hydroxyapatite associated with orthopedic device: experimental study in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Samira Jebahi; Mongi Saoudi; Riadh Badraoui; Tarek Rebai; Hassane Oudadesse; Zoubaier Ellouz; Hassib Keskese; Abdelfattah El Feki; Hafed El Feki
Journal:  Korean J Pathol       Date:  2012-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.