Literature DB >> 140827

Tofranil in the treatment of low back pain.

D G Jenkins, A F Ebbutt, C D Evans.   

Abstract

This report describes a double-blind between-group comparison of Tofranil and placebo in fifty-nine patients admitted to the Joint Service Medical Rehabilitation Unit suffering from low back pain. Patients were given 25 mg of either Tofranil or placebo three times a day for four weeks. Fifteen patients were not included in the analysis, nine dropping out for non-trial related reasons, two dropping out complaining of lost libido and four not taking the tablets, or taking additional drugs. One of the patients complaining of lost libido was taking Tofranil and the other was taking placebo. Over the whole sample there was no significant benefit for Tofranil over placebo as regards physical measurements. Both Tofranil and placebo groups showed a significant improvement during the trial on straight leg raise and backward flexion. For lateral flexion the Tofranil group was significantly worse than the placebo group on entering the trial, and during the trial the Tofranil group improved to match the placebo group. The clinician's pain and stiffness assessments and the patients' pain and stiffness assessments show a significant improvement for both the Tofranil and placebo groups during the trial. However, no difference is shown between Tofranil and placebo. The psychological tests show no difference between Tofranil and placebo and only a marinal improvenmet over initial condition. Further analysis according to initial diagnosis showed nothing conclusive. Numerically, the use of Tofranil produced a marked improvement in pain and stiffness in patients with 'disc lesion only' diagnoses, whereas placebo did not produce an improvement. However, this observation was far from reaching statistical significance. Side-effects were not severe for either drug. Additional medication was rarely used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 140827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  14 in total

Review 1.  Antidepressants as analgesics: a review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M E Lynch
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Christopher Eccleston; Tess E Cooper; Emma Fisher; Brian Anderson; Nick Mr Wilkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 3.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Not Available].

Authors:  R Wörz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  The use of antidepressants in the treatment of chronic pain. A review of the current evidence.

Authors:  G Magni
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Antinociceptive action of tricyclic antidepressant drugs in the rat.

Authors:  E V Hersh; P Kaplan
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1990-07

Review 7.  Low dosage tricyclic antidepressants for depression.

Authors:  T Furukawa; H McGuire; C Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

Review 8.  Antidepressants for the treatment of chronic pain.

Authors:  Bénédicte Verdu; Isabelle Decosterd; Thierry Buclin; Friedrich Stiefel; Alexandre Berney
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  [Treatment of chronic pain syndromes with antidepressants.].

Authors:  R Wörz; J Berlin
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 10.  Antidepressants for non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  D M Urquhart; J L Hoving; W W J J Assendelft; M Roland; M W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.